Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Male-biased sex ratio does not promote increased sperm competitiveness in the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus.
McNamara, Kathryn B; Robinson, Stephen P; Rosa, Márta E; Sloan, Nadia S; van Lieshout, Emile; Simmons, Leigh W.
  • McNamara KB; Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology (M092), the University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, Australia.
  • Robinson SP; Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology (M092), the University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, Australia.
  • Rosa ME; Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
  • Sloan NS; Department of Ecology, Szent István University, Budapest, H-1077, Hungary.
  • van Lieshout E; Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology (M092), the University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, Australia.
  • Simmons LW; Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology (M092), the University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, Australia.
Sci Rep ; 6: 28153, 2016 06 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27306351
ABSTRACT
Sperm competition risk and intensity can select for adaptations that increase male fertilisation success. Evolutionary responses are examined typically by generating increased strength of sexual selection via direct manipulation of female mating rates (by enforcing monandry or polyandry) or by alteration of adult sex ratios. Despite being a model species for sexual selection research, the effect of sexual selection intensity via adult sex-ratio manipulation on male investment strategies has not been investigated in the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. We imposed 32 generations of experimental evolution on 10 populations of beetles by manipulating adult sex ratio. Contrary to predictions, males evolving in male-biased populations did not increase their testes and accessory gland size. This absence of divergence in ejaculate investment was also reflected in the fact that males from male-biased populations were not more successful in either preventing females from remating, or in competing directly for fertilisations. These populations already demonstrate divergence in mating behaviour and immunity, suggesting sufficient generations have passed to allow divergence in physiological and behavioural traits. We propose several explanations for the absence of divergence in sperm competitiveness among our populations and the pitfalls of using sex ratio manipulation to assess evolutionary responses to sexual selection intensity.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Razón de Masculinidad / Espermatozoides / Escarabajos / Preferencia en el Apareamiento Animal Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Razón de Masculinidad / Espermatozoides / Escarabajos / Preferencia en el Apareamiento Animal Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article