Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preventing Breast Implant Contamination in Breast Reconstruction: A National Survey of Current Practice.
Gowda, Arvind U; Chopra, Karan; Brown, Emile N; Slezak, Sheri; Rasko, Yvonne.
  • Gowda AU; From the *Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine; and †Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Ann Plast Surg ; 78(2): 153-156, 2017 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27464530
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Implant-based breast reconstruction is commonly performed by plastic surgeons worldwide. Bacterial contamination is of paramount concern because of its role in biofilm formation and capsular contracture. Plastic surgeons have adopted a variety of perioperative interventions in efforts to reduce implant contamination; however, definitive evidence supporting these practices is lacking.

OBJECTIVE:

The goal of this study was to assess current practice patterns aimed at reducing implant-related infections.

METHODS:

A 20-question survey assessing practices aimed at preventing breast implant-associated infections was generated and distributed via SurveyMonkey to members of the American Society of Plastic Surgery whose e-mail addresses were listed on the American Society of Plastic Surgery member Web site in April 2015.

RESULTS:

A total of 1979 invitations to participate in the survey were sent, and 253 responses were received during the 4-month study period. Of respondents, 81% were in private practice. Respondents averaged 21 ± 9 years in practice, and 34 ± 50 implant-based breast reconstructions were performed per year. A majority of surgeons used chlorhexidine to prepare the surgical site (52%), a triple antibiotic soak for the implant prior to placement (50%) and povidone-iodine for implant pocket irrigation (44%). A no-touch technique utilizing the Keller funnel was adopted by 69% of surgeons. Regarding antibiotic use in the postoperative period, first-generation cephalosporins (eg, cephalexin, cefadroxil) were used by a majority of surgeons (84%), and the most common duration was until drain removal (45%).

CONCLUSIONS:

There is considerable heterogeneity in surgical practices aimed at preventing bacterial contamination in implant-based breast reconstruction. Surgeons may benefit from high-level studies designed to create standardized evidence-based practice guidelines.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis / Control de Infecciones / Implantes de Mama / Atención Perioperativa / Implantación de Mama Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans País como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis / Control de Infecciones / Implantes de Mama / Atención Perioperativa / Implantación de Mama Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans País como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article