Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Retention and Mechanical Behavior of Attachment Systems for Implant-Retained Auricular Prostheses.
Sigua-Rodriguez, Eder Alberto; Goulart, Douglas Rangel; Santos, Zarina Tatia; Alvarez-Pinzon, Natalia; Olate, Sergio; de Albergaria-Barbosa, José Ricardo.
  • Sigua-Rodriguez EA; *Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas †Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil ‡Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universidad de La Frontera §Center for Biomedical Research, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco, Chile.
J Craniofac Surg ; 28(1): 134-138, 2017 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27922962
OBJECTIVE: Auricular prostheses are artificial substitutes for facial defects. The retention of these has often been a problem. This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical behavior of 3 retained auricular prosthetic connections when submitted to a mechanical cycling test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve samples with installed implants were obtained and divided into 3 groups according to their retention system with 4 samples in each group. I: bar-clip system; II: magnet system; and III: ball/o-ring system. Each of samples was submitted to the pull-out test during 3240 cycles (f = 0.5 Hz) to determine its tensile strength. The mechanical cycling test was performed using the servo-hydraulic machine MTS 810-Flex Test 40 (Eden Prairie, MN) that had a 2.5 mm shift at a 10 mm/s velocity. The retaining strength for each of the samples was obtained at 7 intervals. RESULTS: The tensile strength for the group retained by the bar-clip system (29.60 N) was higher with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) when compared with the group retained by the ball/o-ring system (9.41 N) and magnets system (8.61 N) for all periods assessed. The ball/o-ring system showed loss of retention during the fatigue test (Kruskal-Wallis, chi-squared = 17.28; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated systems showed a tensile strength compatible with the clinical use and no fractures of the components were observed.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prótesis e Implantes / Diseño de Prótesis / Oído Externo / Retención de la Prótesis / Interfase Hueso-Implante Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prótesis e Implantes / Diseño de Prótesis / Oído Externo / Retención de la Prótesis / Interfase Hueso-Implante Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article