Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bispectral Index Can Reliably Detect Deep Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Validation Study.
Wang, Zhu-Heng; Chen, Han; Yang, Yan-Lin; Shi, Zhong-Hua; Guo, Qing-Hua; Li, Yu-Wei; Sun, Li-Ping; Qiao, Wei; Zhou, Guan-Hua; Yu, Rong-Guo; Yin, Kai; He, Xuan; Xu, Ming; Brochard, Laurent J; Zhou, Jian-Xin.
  • Wang ZH; From the *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, and †Department of Critical Care Medicine, Daxing Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; ‡Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Fujian Provincial Clinical College Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China; §Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; ‖Keenan Research Centre, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada; and ¶Interdepartmental
Anesth Analg ; 125(1): 176-183, 2017 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28027085
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Excessively deep sedation is prevalent in mechanically ventilated patients and often considered suboptimal. We hypothesized that the bispectral index (BIS), a quantified electroencephalogram instrument, would accurately detect deep levels of sedation.

METHODS:

We prospectively enrolled 90 critically ill mechanically ventilated patients who were receiving sedation. The BIS was monitored for 24 hours and compared with the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) evaluated every 4 hours. Deep sedation was defined as a RASS of -3 to -5. Threshold values of baseline BIS (the lowest value before RASS assessment) and stimulated BIS (the highest value after standardized assessment) for detecting deep sedation were determined in a training set (45 patients, 262 RASS assessments). Diagnostic accuracy was then analyzed in a validation set (45 patients, 264 RASS assessments).

RESULTS:

Deep sedation was only prescribed in 6 (6.7%) patients, but 76 patients (84.4%) had at least 1 episode of deep sedation. Thresholds for detecting deep sedation of 50 for baseline and 80 for stimulated BIS were identified, with respective areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.771 (95% confidence interval, 0.714-0.828) and 0.805 (0.752-0.857). The sensitivity and specificity of baseline BIS were 94.0% and 66.5% and of stimulated BIS were 91.0% and 66.5%. When baseline and stimulated BIS were combined, the sensitivity, specificity, and clinical utility index were 85.0% (76.1%-91.1%), 85.9% (79.5%-90.7%), and 66.9% (57.8%-76.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Combining baseline and stimulated BIS may help detect deep sedation in mechanically ventilated patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Agitación Psicomotora / Respiración Artificial / Electroencefalografía / Sedación Profunda / Monitores de Conciencia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Agitación Psicomotora / Respiración Artificial / Electroencefalografía / Sedación Profunda / Monitores de Conciencia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article