Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Average vs item response theory scores: an illustration using neighbourhood measures in relation to physical activity in adults with arthritis.
Mielenz, T J; Callahan, L F; Edwards, M C.
  • Mielenz TJ; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Allied Health Sciences, Division of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine and the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: tjm2141@columbia.edu.
  • Callahan LF; Thurston Arthritis Research Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Departments of Medicine and Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Edwards MC; Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Public Health ; 142: 15-21, 2017 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28057192
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Our study had two main

objectives:

1) to determine whether perceived neighbourhood physical features are associated with physical activity levels in adults with arthritis; and 2) to determine whether the conclusions are more precise when item response theory (IRT) scores are used instead of average scores for the perceived neighbourhood physical features scales.

METHODS:

Information on health outcomes, neighbourhood characteristics, and physical activity levels were collected using a telephone survey of 937 participants with self-reported arthritis. Neighbourhood walkability and aesthetic features and physical activity levels were measured by self-report. Adjusted proportional odds models were constructed separately for each neighbourhood physical features scale.

RESULTS:

We found that among adults with arthritis, poorer perceived neighbourhood physical features (both walkability and aesthetics) are associated with decreased physical activity level compared to better perceived neighbourhood features. This association was only observed in our adjusted models when IRT scoring was employed with the neighbourhood physical feature scales (walkability scale odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.41; aesthetics scale OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09, 1.62), not when average scoring was used (walkability scale OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00, 1.30; aesthetics scale OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00, 1.36).

CONCLUSION:

In adults with arthritis, those reporting poorer walking and aesthetics features were found to have decreased physical activity levels compared to those reporting better features when IRT scores were used, but not when using average scores. This study may inform public health physical environmental interventions implemented to increase physical activity, especially since arthritis prevalence is expected to be close to 20% of the population in 2020. Based on NIH initiatives, future health research will utilize IRT scores. The differences found in this study may be a precursor for research on how past and future treatment effects may vary between these two types of measurement scores.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis / Teoría Psicológica / Ejercicio Físico / Características de la Residencia / Planificación Ambiental Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis / Teoría Psicológica / Ejercicio Físico / Características de la Residencia / Planificación Ambiental Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article