Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT.
Biddle, Stuart J H; Edwardson, Charlotte L; Gorely, Trish; Wilmot, Emma G; Yates, Thomas; Nimmo, Myra A; Khunti, Kamlesh; Davies, Melanie J.
  • Biddle SJ; School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK. stuart.biddle@vu.edu.au.
  • Edwardson CL; The NIHR Leicester-Loughborough Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit, Leicester, UK. stuart.biddle@vu.edu.au.
  • Gorely T; Institute of Sport, Exercise & Active Living, Victoria University, Footscray Park, Melbourne, VIC, 8001, Australia. stuart.biddle@vu.edu.au.
  • Wilmot EG; Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Yates T; The NIHR Leicester-Loughborough Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit, Leicester, UK.
  • Nimmo MA; School of Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  • Khunti K; Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Davies MJ; Derby Teaching Hospitals, Derby, UK.
BMC Public Health ; 17(1): 80, 2017 01 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28088243
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Reducing sedentary behaviour may have important health implications. This study evaluated the potential enablers and barriers for outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate a pragmatic education based intervention designed to reduce sedentary (sitting) behaviour in young adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS:

Data were collected from participants in the intervention group immediately after an educational workshop addressing sedentary time and diabetes risk (n = 71), through phone interviews 6 weeks (n = 45) after the workshop, and at the conclusion of the 12-month trial (n = 10). The two education session facilitators were also interviewed about the intervention.

RESULTS:

The RCT showed no difference in sedentary time at 12 months between intervention and control arms. The lack of behaviour change appeared not to be attributed to the workshops, which were well led and very favourably received according to feedback. However, factors contributing to this lack of behaviour change include lack of perceived health risk from baseline measures feedback; the preference to adopt physically active behaviours rather than to sit less; certain barriers to sitting less; motivational drift after the 3-month follow-up measurements where participants had no contact for a further 9 months; and, for some, unreliability of the self-monitoring tool.

CONCLUSIONS:

The workshop was well led and well received by the attendees but future interventions need to consider more contact with participants, discuss any specific benefits around simply standing to reduce sitting time, address the barriers to sitting less, and provide a more user-friendly and reliable self-monitoring tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current controlled trials ISRCTN08434554 , MRC project 91409. Registered retrospectively on 22 February 2011.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud / Estado de Salud / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Conducta Sedentaria / Promoción de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud / Estado de Salud / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Conducta Sedentaria / Promoción de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article