Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults.
Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago; Marra, Alexandre R; Bacal, Nydia Strachman; Casaroto, Eduardo; Pinto, Lilian Moreira; Pasternak, Jacyr; Victor, Elivane da Silva; Dos Santos, Oscar Fernando Pavão; Edmond, Michael B.
  • Zinsly Sampaio Camargo T; Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Marra AR; Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Bacal NS; Clinical Laboratory, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Casaroto E; Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Pinto LM; Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Pasternak J; Clinical Laboratory, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Victor ED; Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Dos Santos OF; Division of Medical Practice, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Edmond MB; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Biomed Res Int ; 2016: 6593232, 2016.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28097142
ABSTRACT
Objectives. Diagnostic markers of infection have had little innovation over the last few decades. CD64, a marker expressed on the surface of neutrophils, may have utility for this purpose. Methods. This study was conducted in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) in São Paulo, Brazil, with 89 patients. We evaluated CD64 in patients with documented or clinically diagnosed infection (infection group) and controls (patients without any evidence of infection) by two different methodologies method #1, an in house assay, and method #2, the commercial kit Leuko64 (Trillium Diagnostics). Results. CD64 displayed good discriminating power with a 91.2% sensitivity (95% CI 90.7-91.6%) for detecting infection. The commercial kit (Leuko64) demonstrated higher specificity (87.3%) compared with method #1 as well as better accuracy (88.8%). Conclusions. CD64 seems to be a promising marker of infection in the intensive care setting, with Leuko64 showing a slight advantage.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Biomarcadores / Enfermedad Crítica / Receptores de IgG / Infecciones Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Biomarcadores / Enfermedad Crítica / Receptores de IgG / Infecciones Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article