Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of School Characteristics and Implementation in the X:IT Study-A School-Randomized Smoking Prevention Program.
Bast, Lotus S; Due, Pernille; Ersbøll, Annette K; Damsgaard, Mogens T; Andersen, Anette.
  • Bast LS; National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Oester Farimagsgade 5A, Copenhagen 1353, Denmark.
  • Due P; Statens Institut for Folkesundhed, Syddansk Universitet, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Oester Farimagsgade 5A, Copenhagen 1353, Denmark.
  • Ersbøll AK; National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Oester Farimagsgade 5A, Copenhagen 1353, Denmark.
  • Damsgaard MT; National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Oester Farimagsgade 5A, Copenhagen 1353, Denmark.
  • Andersen A; National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Oester Farimagsgade 5A, Copenhagen 1353, Denmark.
J Sch Health ; 87(5): 329-337, 2017 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28382673
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Assessment of implementation is essential for the evaluation of school-based preventive activities. Interventions are more easily implemented in schools if detailed instructional manuals, lesson plans, and materials are provided; however, implementation may also be affected by other factors than the intervention itself-for example, school-level characteristics, such as principal support and organizational capacity. We examined school-level characteristics of schools in groups of high, medium, and low implementation of a smoking prevention intervention.

METHODS:

The XIT study is a school-randomized trial testing a multicomponent intervention to prevent smoking among adolescents. Our data came from electronic questionnaires completed by school coordinators at 96.1% of participating intervention schools (N = 49) at first follow -up.

RESULTS:

Schools that implemented the XIT intervention to a medium or high degree had higher levels of administrative leadership (77.3% and 83.3% vs 42.9%), school climate/organizational health (95.5% and 91.7% vs 66.7%), mission-policy alignment (90.9% and 100.0% vs 71.4%), personnel expertise (81.8% and 75.0% vs 46.7%), school culture (77.3% and 91.7% vs 53.3%), positive classroom climate (91.4% and 96.2% vs 82.9%) compared with low implementation schools.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings highlight the importance of considering the school context in future health prevention initiatives.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prevención Primaria / Servicios de Salud Escolar / Estudiantes / Prevención del Hábito de Fumar / Promoción de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prevención Primaria / Servicios de Salud Escolar / Estudiantes / Prevención del Hábito de Fumar / Promoción de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article