Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of auxiliary devices during irrigation to increase the cleaning ability of a chelating agent.
Prado, Marina Carvalho; Leal, Fernanda; Simão, Renata Antoun; Gusman, Heloisa; do Prado, Maíra.
  • Prado MC; PROCLIN Department, School of Dentistry, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • Leal F; PROCLIN Department, School of Dentistry, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • Simão RA; Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • Gusman H; Department of Dental Clinic, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • do Prado M; Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Restor Dent Endod ; 42(2): 105-110, 2017 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28503475
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study investigated the cleaning ability of ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) and a novel activation system with reciprocating motion (EC, EasyClean, Easy Equipamentos Odontológicos) when used with a relatively new chelating agent (QMix, Dentsply). In addition, the effect of QMix solution when used for a shorter (1 minute) and a longer application time (3 minutes) was investigated. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Fifty permanent human teeth were prepared with K3 rotary system and 6% sodium hypochlorite. Samples were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 10) according to the final irrigation protocol G1, negative control (distilled water); G2, positive control (QMix 1 minute); G3, QMix 1 minute/UAI; G4, QMix 1 minute/EC; G5, QMix 3 minutes. Subsequently the teeth were prepared and three photomicrographs were obtained in each root third of root walls, by scanning electron microscopy. Two blinded and pre-calibrated examiners evaluated the images using a four-category scoring system. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (p < 0.05).

RESULTS:

There were differences among groups (p < 0.05). UAI showed better cleaning ability than EC (p < 0.05). There were improvements when QMix was used with auxiliary devices in comparison with conventional irrigation (p < 0.05). Conventional irrigation for 3 minutes presented significantly better results than its use for 1 minute (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

QMix should be used for 1 minute when it is used with UAI, since this final irrigation protocol showed the best performance and also allowed clinical optimization of this procedure.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article