Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A qualitative evaluation of breast cancer survivors' acceptance of and preferences for consumer wearable technology activity trackers.
Nguyen, Nga H; Hadgraft, Nyssa T; Moore, Melissa M; Rosenberg, Dori E; Lynch, Chris; Reeves, Marina M; Lynch, Brigid M.
  • Nguyen NH; Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Hadgraft NT; Physical Activity Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Moore MM; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Rosenberg DE; Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Lynch C; Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Reeves MM; School of Public Health, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Lynch BM; School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Support Care Cancer ; 25(11): 3375-3384, 2017 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28540402
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are common amongst breast cancer survivors. These behaviours are associated with an increased risk of comorbidities such as heart disease, diabetes and other cancers. Commercially available, wearable activity trackers (WATs) have potential utility as behavioural interventions to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour within this population.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of the study is to explore the acceptability and usability of consumer WAT amongst postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.

METHODS:

Fourteen participants tested two to three randomly assigned trackers from six available models (Fitbit One, Jawbone Up 24, Garmin Vivofit 2, Garmin Vivosmart, Garmin Vivoactive and Polar A300). Participants wore each device for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week washout period before wearing the next device. Four focus groups employing a semi-structured interview guide explored user perceptions and experiences. We used a thematic analysis approach to analyse focus group transcripts.

RESULTS:

Five themes emerged from our data (1) trackers' increased self-awareness and motivation, (2) breast cancer survivors' confidence and comfort with wearable technology, (3) preferred and disliked features of WAT, (4) concerns related to the disease and (5) peer support and doctor monitoring were possible strategies for WAT application.

CONCLUSIONS:

WATs are perceived as useful and acceptable interventions by postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. Effective WAT interventions may benefit from taking advantage of the simple features of the trackers paired with other behavioural change techniques, such as specialist counselling, doctor monitoring and peer support, along with simple manual instructions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Ejercicio Físico / Monitores de Ejercicio / Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Ejercicio Físico / Monitores de Ejercicio / Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article