Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Potential savings in the diagnosis of vestibular schwannoma.
Scholte, M; Hentschel, M A; Kunst, H P; Steens, S C A; Rovers, M M; Grutters, J P C.
  • Scholte M; Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Hentschel MA; Department of Otolaryngology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Kunst HP; Department of Otolaryngology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Steens SCA; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Rovers MM; Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Grutters JPC; Department of Health Evidence, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 43(1): 285-290, 2018 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28834261
INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to screen patients at risk for vestibular schwannoma (VS). These MRIs are costly and have an extremely low yield; only 3% of patients in the screening population has an actual VS. It might be worthwhile to develop a test to predict VS and refer only a subset of all patients for MRI. OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential savings of such a hypothetical diagnostic test before MRI. DESIGN: We built a decision analytical model of the diagnostic strategy of VS. Input was derived from literature and key opinion leaders. The current strategy was compared to hypothetical new strategies, assigning MRI to the following: (i) all patients with pathology, (ii) all patients with important pathology and (iii) only patients with VS. This resulted in potential cost savings for each strategy. We conducted a budget impact analysis to predict nationwide savings for the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (UK), and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to address uncertainty. RESULTS: Mean savings ranged from €256 (95%CI €250 - €262) or approximately US$284 (95%CI US$277 - US$291) per patient for strategy 1 to €293 (95%CI €290 - €296) or approximately US$325 (95%CI US$322 - US$328) per patient for strategy 3. Future diagnostic strategies can cost up to these amounts per patient and still be cost saving. Annually, for the Netherlands, €2.8 to €3.2 million could be saved and €10.8 to €12.3 million for the UK. CONCLUSIONS: The model shows that substantial savings could be generated if it is possible to further optimise the diagnosis of VS.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Neuroma Acústico / Vigilancia de la Población / Ahorro de Costo / Modelos Económicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Neuroma Acústico / Vigilancia de la Población / Ahorro de Costo / Modelos Económicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article