Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Competitive Antagonism of Anesthetic Action at the γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor by a Novel Etomidate Analog with Low Intrinsic Efficacy.
Ma, Celena; Pejo, Ervin; McGrath, Megan; Jayakar, Selwyn S; Zhou, Xiaojuan; Miller, Keith W; Cohen, Jonathan B; Raines, Douglas E.
  • Ma C; From the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (C.M., E.P., M.M., X.Z., K.W.M., D.E.R.); and Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (S.S.J., J.B.C.).
Anesthesiology ; 127(5): 824-837, 2017 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28857763
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The authors characterized the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor pharmacology of the novel etomidate analog naphthalene-etomidate, a potential lead compound for the development of anesthetic-selective competitive antagonists.

METHODS:

The positive modulatory potencies and efficacies of etomidate and naphthalene-etomidate were defined in oocyte-expressed α1ß3γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors using voltage clamp electrophysiology. Using the same technique, the ability of naphthalene-etomidate to reduce currents evoked by γ-aminobutyric acid alone or γ-aminobutyric acid potentiated by etomidate, propofol, pentobarbital, and diazepam was quantified. The binding affinity of naphthalene-etomidate to the transmembrane anesthetic binding sites of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor was determined from its ability to inhibit receptor photoaffinity labeling by the site-selective photolabels [H]azi-etomidate and R-[H]5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid.

RESULTS:

In contrast to etomidate, naphthalene-etomidate only weakly potentiated γ-aminobutyric acid-evoked currents and induced little direct activation even at a near-saturating aqueous concentration. It inhibited labeling of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors by [H]azi-etomidate and R-[H]5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid with similar half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of 48 µM (95% CI, 28 to 81 µM) and 33 µM (95% CI, 20 to 54 µM). It also reduced the positive modulatory actions of anesthetics (propofol > etomidate ~ pentobarbital) but not those of γ-aminobutyric acid or diazepam. At 300 µM, naphthalene-etomidate increased the half-maximal potentiating propofol concentration from 6.0 µM (95% CI, 4.4 to 8.0 µM) to 36 µM (95% CI, 17 to 78 µM) without affecting the maximal response obtained at high propofol concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS:

Naphthalene-etomidate is a very low-efficacy etomidate analog that exhibits the pharmacology of an anesthetic competitive antagonist at the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Unión Competitiva / Receptores de GABA-A / Antagonistas del GABA / Etomidato Límite: Animals Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Unión Competitiva / Receptores de GABA-A / Antagonistas del GABA / Etomidato Límite: Animals Idioma: En Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article