Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas.
Melles, Ronald B; Holladay, Jack T; Chang, William J.
  • Melles RB; The Permanent Medical Group, Redwood City Medical Center, Redwood City, California. Electronic address: Ronald.Melles@kp.org.
  • Holladay JT; Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
  • Chang WJ; The Permanent Medical Group, Redwood City Medical Center, Redwood City, California.
Ophthalmology ; 125(2): 169-178, 2018 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28951074
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas (Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Olsen, and SRK/T) in the prediction of postoperative refraction using a single optical biometry device.

DESIGN:

Retrospective consecutive case series.

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 13 301 cataract operations with an AcrySof SN60WF implant and 5200 operations with a SA60AT implant (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX).

METHODS:

All patients undergoing cataract surgery between July 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, with Lenstar 900 optical biometry were eligible. A single eye per patient was included in the final analysis, resulting in a total of 18 501 cases. We compared the performance of each formula with respect to the error in predicted spherical equivalent and evaluated the effect of applying the Wang-Koch (WK) adjustment for eyes with axial length >25.0 mm on 4 of the formulas.

RESULTS:

For the SN60WF, the standard deviation of the prediction error, in order of lowest to highest, was the Barrett Universal II (0.404), Olsen (0.424), Haigis (0.437), Holladay 2 (0.450), Holladay 1 (0.453), SRK/T (0.463), and Hoffer Q (0.473), and the results for the SA60AT were similar. The Barrett formula was significantly better than the other formulas in postoperative refraction prediction (P < 0.01) for both IOL types. Application of the WK axial length modification generally resulted in a shift from hyperopic to myopic outcomes in long eyes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, the Barrett Universal II formula had the lowest prediction error for the 2 IOL models studied.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Refracción Ocular / Biometría / Óptica y Fotónica / Hiperopía / Lentes Intraoculares / Miopía Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Refracción Ocular / Biometría / Óptica y Fotónica / Hiperopía / Lentes Intraoculares / Miopía Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article