Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identification of Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: An International Modified Delphi Survey.
Morisset, Julie; Johannson, Kerri A; Jones, Kirk D; Wolters, Paul J; Collard, Harold R; Walsh, Simon L F; Ley, Brett.
  • Morisset J; Centre Hospitalier de L'Universite de Montreal, 25443, Montreal, Quebec, Canada ; julie.morisset@umontreal.ca.
  • Johannson KA; University of Calgary, Medicine, Calgary, Canada ; Kerri.Johannson@albertahealthservices.ca.
  • Jones KD; University of California, San Francisco, Pathology, San Francisco, California, United States ; Kirk.Jones@ucsf.edu.
  • Wolters PJ; University of California, Medicine/CVRI, San Francisco, California, United States ; paul.wolters@ucsf.edu.
  • Collard HR; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Medicine, San Francisco, California, United States ; hal.collard@ucsf.edu.
  • Walsh SLF; King's College, Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Radiology, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ; slfwalsh@gmail.com.
  • Ley B; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Medicine, San Francisco, California, United States ; brett.ley@ucsf.edu.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 197(8): 1036-1044, 2018 04 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29172641
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE Current diagnosis of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP) involves considering a combination of clinical, radiological, and pathological information in multidisciplinary team discussions. However, this approach is highly variable with poor agreement between centers.

OBJECTIVES:

We aimed to identify diagnostic criteria for cHP that reach consensus among international experts.

METHODS:

A 3-round modified Delphi survey was conducted between April and August 2017. Forty-five experts in interstitial lung disease from 14 countries participated in the online survey. Diagnostic items included in round 1 were generated using expert interviews and literature review. During rounds 1 and 2, experts rated the importance of each diagnostic item on a 5-point Likert scale. The a priori threshold of consensus was ≥ 75% of experts rating a diagnostic item as very important or important. In the third round, experts graded the items that met consensus as important and provided their level of diagnostic confidence for a series of clinical scenarios. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Consensus was achieved on 18 of the 40 diagnostic items. Among these, experts gave the highest level of importance to the identification of a causative antigen, time relation between exposure and disease, mosaic attenuation on chest imaging, and poorly formed non-necrotizing granulomas on pathology. In clinical scenarios, the diagnostic confidence of experts in cHP was heightened by the presence of these diagnostic items.

CONCLUSION:

This consensus-based approach for the diagnosis of cHP represents a first step towards the development of international guidelines for the diagnosis of cHP.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encuestas y Cuestionarios / Técnica Delphi / Consenso / Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encuestas y Cuestionarios / Técnica Delphi / Consenso / Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article