Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of posture and anatomical location on inter-recti distance measured using ultrasound imaging in parous women.
Gillard, S; Ryan, C G; Stokes, M; Warner, M; Dixon, J.
  • Gillard S; School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK. Electronic address: S.gillard@worc.ac.uk.
  • Ryan CG; School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Stokes M; University of Southampton, Southampton and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, UK.
  • Warner M; University of Southampton, Southampton and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, UK.
  • Dixon J; School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract ; 34: 1-7, 2018 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29195217
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional repeated measures.

OBJECTIVES:

To quantify the effects of posture and measurement site on the inter-recti distance (IRD) and investigate the reliability of IRD measurement using ultrasound imaging in different postures.

BACKGROUND:

The linea alba connects the rectus abdominis muscles anteriorly and the width is known as the IRD. The IRD is usually measured in crook-lying and is the primary outcome measure to assess for a divarication of recti abdominis (DRA). The effects of posture and measurement site on the IRD have not been investigated.

METHODS:

Ultrasound imaging was used to measure IRD in 41 women ≥8 weeks postpartum. The IRD was measured at three sites (superior-umbilicus, umbilicus and inferior-umbilicus), in three postures (crook-lying, sitting and standing), and repeated one-week later. The effects of posture and site were investigated using one-way ANOVAs. Reliability was analysed using Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland Altman analyses, standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change.

RESULTS:

The IRD was wider when standing vs. lying at both the superior-umbilicus and umbilicus by 0.30 cm (95% CI 0.21 to 0.39) and 0.20 cm (0.11-0.30) respectively (p < 0.001). Measurements at the inferior-umbilicus were, on average, 1.6 and 2.1 cm narrower than superior-umbilicus and umbilicus sites, respectively (p < 0.001). There was high intra-rater reliability within-session (ICC3.3) and between-session (ICC3.1) at all sites measured.

CONCLUSION:

The IRD can be measured reliably at all sites and postures. The IRD is wider at superior-umbilicus and umbilicus when upright compared with lying. There is a difference in IRD between all sites measured.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Postura / Recto del Abdomen / Periodo Posparto Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Postura / Recto del Abdomen / Periodo Posparto Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article