Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pilot trial of CRLX101 in patients with advanced, chemotherapy-refractory gastroesophageal cancer.
Chao, Joseph; Lin, James; Frankel, Paul; Clark, Andrew J; Wiley, Devin T; Garmey, Edward; Fakih, Marwan; Lim, Dean; Chung, Vincent; Luevanos, Eloise; Eliasof, Scott; Davis, Mark E; Yen, Yun.
  • Chao J; Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Lin J; Division of Gastroenterology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Frankel P; Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Clark AJ; Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
  • Wiley DT; Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
  • Garmey E; Cerulean Pharma Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Fakih M; Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Lim D; Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Chung V; Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Luevanos E; Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Eliasof S; Cerulean Pharma Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Davis ME; Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
  • Yen Y; The Graduate Institute for Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 8(6): 962-969, 2017 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29299355
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

CRLX101 is an investigational nanoparticle-drug conjugate with a camptothecin payload. Preclinical evidence indicated preferential uptake in tumors, and tumor xenograft models demonstrate superiority of CRLX101 over irinotecan. A pilot trial was conducted at recommended phase 2 dosing (RP2D) using the bimonthly schedule to assess preferential uptake of CRLX101 in tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue in endoscopically accessible tumors in chemotherapy-refractory gastroesophageal cancer. Results from the biopsies were previously reported and herein we present the clinical outcomes.

METHODS:

Patients initiated CRLX101 dosed at RP2D (15 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Detection of preferential CRLX101 tumor uptake was the primary endpoint and objective response rate (ORR) was a secondary endpoint. With a sample size of ten patients, the study had 90% power to detect ≥1 responder if the true response rate is ≥21%.

RESULTS:

Between Dec. 2012 and Dec. 2014, ten patients with chemotherapy-refractory (median 2 prior lines of therapy, range 1-4) gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled. The median time-to-progression was 1.7 months. Best response was seen in one patient with stable disease (SD) for 8 cycles. Only ≥ grade 3 drug-related toxicity occurred in one patient with grade 3 cardiac chest pain who was able to resume therapy after CRLX101 was reduced to 12 mg/m2.

CONCLUSIONS:

Bimonthly CRLX101 demonstrated minimal activity with SD as best response in this heavily pretreated population. Future efforts with CRLX101 in gastric cancer should focus on combination and more dose-intensive strategies given its favorable toxicity profile and evidence of preferential tumor uptake.
Palabras clave