Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasonographic assessment of the internal jugular vein for the estimation of central venous pressure in hemodialysis patients: A preliminary study.
Kerleroux, Basile; Pasco, Jeremy; Dupuis, Mathieu; Eustache, Marine; Lemrabott, Ahmed; Jouzel, Charlotte; Albert, Catherine; Janot, Kevin; Morel, Baptiste; Pruna, André.
  • Kerleroux B; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Bretonneau University Hospital, Tours, France.
  • Pasco J; Department of Public Health, Bretonneau University Hospital, Tours, France.
  • Dupuis M; Department of Nephrology and Haemodialysis, Louis Pasteur Hospital, Chartres, France.
  • Eustache M; Department of Nephrology and Haemodialysis, Louis Pasteur Hospital, Chartres, France.
  • Lemrabott A; Department of Nephrology and Haemodialysis, Louis Pasteur Hospital, Chartres, France.
  • Jouzel C; Department of Nephrology and Haemodialysis, Louis Pasteur Hospital, Chartres, France.
  • Albert C; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Bretonneau University Hospital, Tours, France.
  • Janot K; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Bretonneau University Hospital, Tours, France.
  • Morel B; Department of Paediatric Radiology, Clocheville Bretonneau University Hospital, Tours, France.
  • Pruna A; Department of Nephrology and Haemodialysis, Louis Pasteur Hospital, Chartres, France.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 46(4): 253-258, 2018 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29314087
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate a new noninvasive method to assess central venous pressure (CVP) in hemodialysis patients, based on the ultrasonographic measurement of the collapsing point of the internal jugular vein (CVPni). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this preliminary, noninterventional, single center study, we enrolled 22 dialyzed patients with an indwelling jugular catheter. CVPni was compared to the gold-standard invasive measurement of CVP using the central venous catheter (CVPi). Agreement between CVPi and CVPni was assessed by Bland and Altman Method. Correlation was assessed by linear regression.

RESULTS:

A strong correlation was observed between CVPi and CVPni (OR = 3.47 [2.96; 4.07], P < .0001). For overloaded patients, the area under the curve for the operating characteristic curve was 0.971 (IC95 0.915; 1.000). For under-loaded patients, area under the curve was 0.971 (IC95 0.917; 1.000). The mean bias between intra-individual CVPi and CVPni measures was 0.57 cm H2 O (SD 3.1 cm H2 O).

CONCLUSION:

CVPni appears as a noninvasive and reliable technique. Further studies are required to confirm these results and to assess the direct clinical impact of this new method.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea / Presión Venosa Central / Diálisis Renal / Venas Yugulares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea / Presión Venosa Central / Diálisis Renal / Venas Yugulares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article