Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perinephric Hematoma Size is Independently Associated with the Need for Urological Intervention in Multisystem Blunt Renal Trauma.
Zemp, Logan; Mann, Uday; Rourke, Keith F.
  • Zemp L; Division of Urology, Northern Alberta Urology Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Mann U; Division of Urology, Northern Alberta Urology Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Rourke KF; Division of Urology, Northern Alberta Urology Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: krourke@ualberta.ca.
J Urol ; 199(5): 1283-1288, 2018 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29360530
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We examined radiographic predictors of intervention for blunt renal trauma independent of AAST-OIS (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A total of 328 patients with blunt renal trauma from October 2004 to December 2014 were identified for analysis. Hospital records and diagnostic imaging were reviewed to identify the need for urological intervention, including angiographic embolization, nephrectomy, renorrhaphy, ureteral stenting or percutaneous drainage. Factors examined included patient age, gender, length of stay, ISS (Injury Severity Score), AAST-OIS, laceration location, length and number, perinephric hematoma characteristics, intravascular contrast extravasation and devitalized segment status. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were performed as appropriate.

RESULTS:

Mean patient age was 37.0 years and mean ISS was 31.7. A total of 31 urological interventions were required in 27 patients (8.2%), including ureteral stenting in 38.7%, angiographic embolization in 32.3%, nephrectomy in 22.6%, renorrhaphy in 3.2% and percutaneous drainage in 3.2%. On univariate analysis AAST-OIS, hematoma diameter, hematoma area, intravascular contrast extravasation, laceration length, laceration number, degree of devitalization and devitalized fragment presence were associated with the need for intervention (each p <0.001). On multivariate analysis only AAST-OIS grade (OR 69.4, 95% CI 6.4-748.3, p <0.001) and hematoma diameter (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-1.9, p = 0.004) or area (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.012) remained associated with urological intervention.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although AAST-OIS is strongly associated with the need for urological intervention, perinephric hematoma size is also independently associated with this occurrence. Perinephric hematoma diameter should be considered during clinical decision making and incorporated into a revised injury grading system.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos / Heridas no Penetrantes / Hematoma / Riñón Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos / Heridas no Penetrantes / Hematoma / Riñón Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article