Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term follow-up of Chagas heart disease patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for secondary prevention.
Pavão, Maria Licia Ribeiro Cury; Arfelli, Elerson; Scorzoni-Filho, Adilson; Rassi, Anis; Pazin-Filho, Antônio; Pavão, Rafael Brolio; Marin-Neto, J Antonio; Schmidt, André.
  • Pavão MLRC; Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Arfelli E; Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Scorzoni-Filho A; Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Rassi A; Anis Rassi Hospital, Goiânia, Goiânia, Brazil.
  • Pazin-Filho A; Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Pavão RB; Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Marin-Neto JA; Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Schmidt A; Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 41(6): 583-588, 2018 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29578582
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Chagas heart disease (CHD) is a dilated cardiomyopathy characterized by malignant ventricular arrhythmias and increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Much controversy exists concerning the efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICDs) in CHD because of mixed results observed. We report our long-term experience with ICDs for secondary prevention in CHD, with the specific aim of assessing the results in groups with preserved or depressed global left ventricular function.

METHODS:

111 patients (75 males; 60 ± 12 years) were followed for 1,948 ± 1,275 days after ICD. Time to death was the primary outcome; LVEF ≤ 45% the exposure; and age, gender, and ICD therapy delivery the potential confounders. We used time-to-event methods and Cox proportional models for analysis, censoring observations at time of death or at 5-year follow-up in survivors.

RESULTS:

Seventy-two percent of the patients presented at least one sustained ventricular arrhythmia requiring appropriate therapy, and only three patients received inappropriate therapy. Death occurred in 50 (45%) patients, with an annual mortality rate of 8.4%, mostly due to refractory heart failure or noncardiac causes. Unadjusted survival rates were significantly distinct between patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45% (26 deaths), 50.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36.2%-63.2%) when compared to patients with LVEF > 45% (10 deaths), 77.6% (95% CI 62.3%-87.3%, P < 0.01). After adjusting for confounders, low LVEF (hazard ratio [HR] 5.2, 95% CI 2.3-11.6), age (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07), and female gender (HR 3.97, 95% CI 1.85-8.54) were independently associated with the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS:

ICDs successfully aborted life-threatening arrhythmias in CHD patients. Impaired left ventricular function predicted higher mortality in CHD patients with an ICD for secondary prevention of SCD.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cardiomiopatía Chagásica / Muerte Súbita Cardíaca / Taquicardia Ventricular / Desfibriladores Implantables / Prevención Secundaria Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cardiomiopatía Chagásica / Muerte Súbita Cardíaca / Taquicardia Ventricular / Desfibriladores Implantables / Prevención Secundaria Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article