Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Climate extremes, land-climate feedbacks and land-use forcing at 1.5°C.
Seneviratne, Sonia I; Wartenburger, Richard; Guillod, Benoit P; Hirsch, Annette L; Vogel, Martha M; Brovkin, Victor; van Vuuren, Detlef P; Schaller, Nathalie; Boysen, Lena; Calvin, Katherine V; Doelman, Jonathan; Greve, Peter; Havlik, Petr; Humpenöder, Florian; Krisztin, Tamas; Mitchell, Daniel; Popp, Alexander; Riahi, Keywan; Rogelj, Joeri; Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich; Sillmann, Jana; Stehfest, Elke.
  • Seneviratne SI; Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland sonia.seneviratne@ethz.ch.
  • Wartenburger R; Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Guillod BP; Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hirsch AL; Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Vogel MM; Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Brovkin V; Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • van Vuuren DP; Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstrasse 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Schaller N; PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, PO Box 303, Bilthoven 3720 AH, The Netherlands.
  • Boysen L; Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Calvin KV; CICERO, P.O. Box 1129, Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
  • Doelman J; Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstrasse 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Greve P; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Joint Global Change Research Institute, College Park, MD 20740, USA.
  • Havlik P; PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, PO Box 303, Bilthoven 3720 AH, The Netherlands.
  • Humpenöder F; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg 2361, Austria.
  • Krisztin T; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg 2361, Austria.
  • Mitchell D; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, PO Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany.
  • Popp A; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg 2361, Austria.
  • Riahi K; School of Geographical Sciences, University Road, Clifton, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK.
  • Rogelj J; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, PO Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany.
  • Schleussner CF; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg 2361, Austria.
  • Sillmann J; Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Stehfest E; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg 2361, Austria.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci ; 376(2119)2018 May 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29610382
ABSTRACT
This article investigates projected changes in temperature and water cycle extremes at 1.5°C of global warming, and highlights the role of land processes and land-use changes (LUCs) for these projections. We provide new comparisons of changes in climate at 1.5°C versus 2°C based on empirical sampling analyses of transient simulations versus simulations from the 'Half a degree Additional warming, Prognosis and Projected Impacts' (HAPPI) multi-model experiment. The two approaches yield similar overall results regarding changes in climate extremes on land, and reveal a substantial difference in the occurrence of regional extremes at 1.5°C versus 2°C. Land processes mediated through soil moisture feedbacks and land-use forcing play a major role for projected changes in extremes at 1.5°C in most mid-latitude regions, including densely populated areas in North America, Europe and Asia. This has important implications for low-emissions scenarios derived from integrated assessment models (IAMs), which include major LUCs in ambitious mitigation pathways (e.g. associated with increased bioenergy use), but are also shown to differ in the simulated LUC patterns. Biogeophysical effects from LUCs are not considered in the development of IAM scenarios, but play an important role for projected regional changes in climate extremes, and are thus of high relevance for sustainable development pathways.This article is part of the theme issue 'The Paris Agreement understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels'.
Palabras clave