Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intermittent fetal heart rate monitoring using a fetoscope or hand held Doppler in rural Tanzania: a randomized controlled trial.
Mdoe, Paschal Francis; Ersdal, Hege L; Mduma, Estomih R; Perlman, Jeffrey M; Moshiro, Robert; Wangwe, Peter T; Kidanto, Hussein.
  • Mdoe PF; Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Mbulu, Tanzania. pfmdoe@gmail.com.
  • Ersdal HL; Department of Health Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway. pfmdoe@gmail.com.
  • Mduma ER; Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, PO box 9000, Haydom, Mbulu, Tanzania. pfmdoe@gmail.com.
  • Perlman JM; Department of Health Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Moshiro R; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Wangwe PT; Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Mbulu, Tanzania.
  • Kidanto H; Department of Health Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 18(1): 134, 2018 May 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29728142
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Neonatal mortality is a global challenge, with an estimated 1.3 million intrapartum stillbirths in 2015. The majority of these were found in low resource settings with limited options to intrapartum fetal heart monitoring devices. This trial compared frequency of abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR) detection and adverse perinatal outcomes (i.e. fresh stillbirths, 24-h neonatal deaths, admission to neonatal care unit) among women intermittently assessed by Doppler or fetoscope in a rural low-resource setting.

METHODS:

This was an open-label randomized controlled trial conducted at Haydom Lutheran Hospital from March 2013 through August 2015. Inclusion criteria were; women in labor, singleton, cephalic presentation, normal FHR on admission (120-160 beats/minute), and cervical dilatation ≤7 cm. Verbal consent was obtained.

RESULTS:

A total of 2684 women were recruited, 1309 in the Doppler and 1375 in the fetoscope arms, respectively. Abnormal FHR was detected in 55 (4.2%) vs 42 (3.1%). (RR = 1.38; 95%CI 0.93, 2.04) in the Doppler and fetoscope arms, respectively. Bag mask ventilation was performed in 80 (6.1%) vs 82 (6.0%). (RR = 1.03; 95%CI 0.76, 1.38) of neonates, and adverse perinatal outcome was comparable 32(2.4%) vs 35(2.5%). (RR = 0.9; 95%CI 0.59, 1.54), in the Doppler and fetoscope arms, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

This trial failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the detection of abnormal FHR between intermittently used Doppler and fetoscope and adverse perinatal outcomes. However, FHR measurements were not performed as often as recommended by international guidelines. Conducting a randomized controlled study in rural settings with limited resources is associated with major challenges. TRIAL REGISTRATION This clinical trial was registered on April 2013 with registration number NCT01869582 .
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal / Cardiotocografía / Ultrasonografía Doppler / Países en Desarrollo / Sufrimiento Fetal / Fetoscopía / Determinación de la Frecuencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy País como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal / Cardiotocografía / Ultrasonografía Doppler / Países en Desarrollo / Sufrimiento Fetal / Fetoscopía / Determinación de la Frecuencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy País como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article