Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decreased operator X-ray exposure by optimized fluoroscopy during radiofrequency ablation of common atrial flutter.
Zedira, A; Greffier, J; Brunet, X; Pereira, F; Winum, P-F; Granier, M.
  • Zedira A; Department of Cardiology, centre hospitalier universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
  • Greffier J; Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Group, EA 2415, centre hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France.
  • Brunet X; Department of Cardiology, centre hospitalier universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
  • Pereira F; Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Group, EA 2415, centre hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France.
  • Winum PF; Department of Cardiology, centre hospitalier universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
  • Granier M; Department of Cardiology, centre hospitalier universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France. Electronic address: mathieugranier@hotmail.com.
Diagn Interv Imaging ; 99(10): 625-632, 2018 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29754870
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate operator and patient irradiation during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of common atrial flutter (AF) using three different fluoroscopy settings. MATERIAL AND

METHOD:

A total of 38 patients who underwent RFA of AF with three different fluoroscopy settings (low dose, standard dose and collimated field) were included. Twelve patients (11 men, 1 woman; mean age, 67±12 [SD]years) were included in the low dose group (3.75 frames per second), 13 patients (13 men; mean age, 66±8 [SD]years) were included in the standard dose group (7.5 frames per second) and 13 patients (13 men; mean age, 71±12 [SD]years) were included in the collimated field group (7.5 frames per second). Operator and patient exposure were compared between groups.

RESULT:

No differences in procedure time and radiation exposure were found between the three groups. In the low dose group, mean operator X-ray exposures of eye-lens (4.7±2.9 [SD]µSv/h; range 0.9-10.5µSv/h), whole body (1.6±1.2 [SD]µSv/h; range 0.5-3.6µSv/h) and hand skin (11.1±10.8 [SD] µSv/h; range 2.4-35.4µSv/h) were significantly lower than those in the standard dose group (P<0.001). Significant patient dose reduction was found between low dose group (0.7±0.4 [SD]Gy/h; range 0.3-0.9Gy/h) and standard (1.7±0.5 [SD]Gy/h; range 0.8 to 3.9Gy/h) and collimated (1.8±0.5 [SD]Gy/h; range 0.7-3.0Gy/h) groups (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION:

The use of a low dose setting (3.75 f/s) during fluoroscopy dramatically reduces operator's irradiation during RFA of AF by a mean of 90%.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosis de Radiación / Fluoroscopía / Exposición Profesional / Exposición a la Radiación / Ablación por Radiofrecuencia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosis de Radiación / Fluoroscopía / Exposición Profesional / Exposición a la Radiación / Ablación por Radiofrecuencia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article