Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does trans-spinal direct current stimulation modulate the Hoffmann reflexes of healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysisc.
Albuquerque, Plínio Luna; Mendonça, Thyciane; Campêlo, Mayara; Shirahige, Lívia; Monte-Silva, Kátia.
  • Albuquerque PL; Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Mendonça T; Postgraduate Program in Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Campêlo M; Department of Physical Therapy, Centro Universitário Tabosa de Almeida ASCES/UNITA, Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Shirahige L; Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Monte-Silva K; Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Spinal Cord ; 56(11): 1022-1031, 2018 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29895879
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES:

To summarize the available evidence regarding the effects of trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on spinal monosynaptic circuit excitability in healthy individuals.

SETTING:

Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Brazil.

METHODS:

Abstract screening was performed independently by two authors for studies found in the following databases PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and LILACS. If the authors were unable to agree, a third reviewer was consulted. Randomized clinical trials that reported monosynaptic reflex measures were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias, and information extracted about the spinal neurophysiological and stimulation protocols and their results.

RESULTS:

The initial search identified 538 studies. After applying the inclusion criteria and excluding duplicates, seven crossover studies were included in the risk of bias assessment, and six studies in the meta-analyses. The meta-analysis results did not show any significant differences between anodal (pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.09, 95% CI = -0.72 to 0.55, p = 0.79, I2 = 67%) or cathodal tsDCS (pooled SMD = 0.28, 95% CI = -0.07 to 0.63, p = 0.11, I2 = 0%) and sham tsDCS for Hoffmann reflex modulation.

CONCLUSION:

tsDCS did not affect the Hoffmann reflex, as shown in six studies. However, these findings come from studies with selection, performance and detection bias, and further research is needed to examine the effect of this intervention.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médula Espinal / Reflejo Anormal / Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médula Espinal / Reflejo Anormal / Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article