Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Significance of leukocytosis prior to cardiac device implantation.
Kumar, Darpan S; Tompkins, Christine M; Veenhuyzen, George D; Henrikson, Charles A.
  • Kumar DS; Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Tompkins CM; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Veenhuyzen GD; Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
  • Henrikson CA; Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 41(9): 1197-1200, 2018 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29987911
INTRODUCTION: Infection remains a dreaded complication after cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) placement. The prognostic value of the preoperative white blood cell (WBC) count, in the absence of other signs of infection, at time of CIED placement as a predictor of postoperative infection, has not been previously examined. METHODS: The study population included 1,247 consecutive device implantations over a 4-year period that met inclusion criteria. The association between preoperative WBC count and resultant infection postoperatively was examined. Early infection was defined as definite infection of the pocket or lead system or development of systemic infection identified <60 days after implantation. Preoperative WBC counts were obtained within 48 hours of the procedure. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the population studied were mean age of 65 years, 66% men, and 72% Caucasian. Pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and biventricular ICDs were implanted in 41%, 44%, and 15%, respectively. Average procedure time was 174 minutes ± 80. Of 1,247 device implantations, there were 10 infections (0.8%). Mean preprocedure WBC count in those diagnosed with infection was 8.1 × 103 /uL (range 5-11.7) and in those without infection was 7.8 × 10(3)/uL (range 2.3-29) (P = 0.73). Cases resulting in infection demonstrated minimal change in WBC count (mean +5.5 ± 26.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in preprocedure WBC count between the two groups (P = 0.7). Regardless of preprocedural WBC, no patients had other signs and symptoms of infection at time of device implantation. CONCLUSION: As an isolated finding, an elevated preprocedure WBC should not delay the implantation of an indicated device.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis / Leucocitosis Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis / Leucocitosis Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article