Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Description of Laying Hen Husbandry and Management Practices in Canada.
van Staaveren, Nienke; Decina, Caitlin; Baes, Christine F; Widowski, Tina M; Berke, Olaf; Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra.
  • van Staaveren N; Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. nvanstaa@uoguelph.ca.
  • Decina C; Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. cdecina@uoguelph.ca.
  • Baes CF; Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. cbaes@uoguelph.ca.
  • Widowski TM; Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. twidowsk@uoguelph.ca.
  • Berke O; Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. oberke@uoguelph.ca.
  • Harlander-Matauschek A; Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. aharland@uoguelph.ca.
Animals (Basel) ; 8(7)2018 Jul 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29997334
Canadian laying hen farms are transitioning from conventional cage housing to furnished cage and non-cage housing systems to improve laying hen welfare. However, little is known about the current housing and management systems in Canada. This study addresses this knowledge gap by describing different housing and management practices used on farms where laying hens were housed in furnished cages or non-cage housing systems. A questionnaire covering farm and housing conditions, litter management, nutrition and feeding, environmental control, flock characteristics, rearing and placement, health, egg production and performance were distributed through provincial egg boards to 122 producers across Canada. Data were collected from 65 laying hen flocks (52.5% response rate) in 26 furnished cage, 17 single-tier and 22 multi-tier systems. Flocks were on average 45.1 ± 14.59 weeks old (range: 19⁻69 weeks). Frequencies of different management practices were calculated according to housing system. Most flocks were reared in the same housing system as they were housed in during lay, with the exception of furnished cage layers which were reared in conventional cage systems. Results indicated that a large proportion of non-cage systems were either fully slatted or had manure as a litter substrate, which could have implications for consumer perspectives on these systems. Further research is needed to develop clear recommendations on proper litter management for farmers. In general, flock health was managed through daily inspections and vaccination schemes, whereas veterinarian involvement on-farm was less common. Vaccination, hygiene, and effective biosecurity should be maintained to ensure good health in laying hens in furnished cage and non-cage systems during the transition to these systems.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article