On-Pump Beating Heart Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Early After Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis From the ANZSCTS Database.
Heart Lung Circ
; 28(8): 1267-1276, 2019 Aug.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30075944
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) carries a high risk of mortality. By avoiding cardioplegic arrest and aortic cross-clamping, on-pump beating heart CABG (ONBEAT) may benefit patients requiring urgent or emergency revascularisation in the setting of AMI. We evaluated the early and long-term outcomes of ONBEAT versus conventional CABG (ONSTOP) utilising the ANZSCTS National Cardiac Surgery Database.METHODS:
Between 2001 and 2015, 5,851 patients underwent non-elective on-pump CABG within 7 days of AMI. Of these, 77 patients (1.3%) underwent ONBEAT and 5774 (98.7%) underwent ONSTOP surgery. Propensity-score matching (with a 12 matching ratio) was performed for risk adjustment. Survival data were obtained from the National Death Index.RESULTS:
Before matching, the unadjusted 30-day mortality was ONBEAT 9/77 (11.7%) vs. ONSTOP 256/5,774 (4.4%), p<0.001. Preoperative factors independently associated with the ONBEAT were septuagenarian age, peripheral vascular disease, redo surgery, cardiogenic shock, emergency surgery and single-vessel disease. After propensity-score matching, 30-day mortality was similar (ONBEAT 9/77 (11.7%) vs. ONSTOP 16/154 (10.4%), p=0.85), as was the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ONBEAT 17/77 (22.1%) vs. ONSTOP 38/154 (24.7%), p=0.84). ONBEAT patients received fewer distal anastomoses and were more likely to have incomplete revascularisation (ONBEAT 15/77 (19.5%) vs. ONSTOP 15/154, (9.7%), p=0.03). Despite this, 12-year survival was comparable (ONBEAT 64.8% (95% CI 39.4-82.4%) vs. ONSTOP 63.6% (95% CI 50.5, 74.3%), p=0.89).CONCLUSIONS:
ONBEAT can be performed safely in high-risk patients requiring CABG early after AMI with similar short and long-term survival compared to ONSTOP.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Choque Cardiogénico
/
Puente de Arteria Coronaria
/
Bases de Datos Factuales
/
Paro Cardíaco Inducido
/
Infarto del Miocardio
Tipo de estudio:
Observational_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Límite:
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Año:
2019
Tipo del documento:
Article