Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Luted with RMGIC After Er:YAG Laser Etching with Two Pulse Modes Using a Digitally Controlled "X-Runner" Handpiece.
Latic Hodzic, Leila; Ionescu, Andrei C; Brambilla, Eugenio; Basso, Matteo; Gabric, Dragana; Mestrovic, Senka.
  • Latic Hodzic L; 1 Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb , Zagreb, Croatia .
  • Ionescu AC; 2 Department of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, University of Milan , Milan, Italy .
  • Brambilla E; 2 Department of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, University of Milan , Milan, Italy .
  • Basso M; 2 Department of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, University of Milan , Milan, Italy .
  • Gabric D; 3 Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb , Zagreb, Croatia .
  • Mestrovic S; 1 Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb , Zagreb, Croatia .
Photomed Laser Surg ; 36(11): 608-613, 2018 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30227107
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) values of orthodontic brackets luted using a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) on enamel surfaces etched using either an ErYAG laser in two different working modes, or a conventional etching protocol, including phosphoric acid. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Sixty healthy human premolars were randomly allocated to three experimental groups (n = 20) and etched with Group 1 ErYAG laser in super-short pulse (SSP) mode (100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W); Group 2 ErYAG laser in quantum square pulse mode (120 mJ, 10 Hz, 1.2 W) using a digitally controlled handpiece ("X-Runner"); Group 3 (control) 5.25% sodium hypochlorite pretreatment, then 37% phosphoric acid for 15 sec. Stainless steel brackets were bonded using light-curing RMGIC for orthodontic bonding. After term cycling (1800 cycles), SBS testing was performed using a universal testing machine. After debonding, both enamel and bracket surfaces were examined to determine the amount of RMGIC still present on the surfaces.

RESULTS:

Group 3 surfaces gave the lowest mean SBS (10.6104 ± 2.66196 MPa), whereas Group 1 provided the highest 1 (13.1795 ± 3.37904 MPa), which was significantly different from the control (Group 3, p = 0.0226). Group 2 provided intermediate values (11.8486 ± 0.59832 MPa) nonsignificantly different from the control or from SSP (p = 0.4215 and p = 0.3082, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

ErYAG laser treatment in SSP mode of enamel surfaces for orthodontic bonding provided higher SBS and a shear behavior of the luting material similar to the conventional acid-etching procedures, making it a viable alternative to acid etching.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo / Soportes Ortodóncicos / Grabado Dental / Láseres de Estado Sólido / Cementos de Ionómero Vítreo Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo / Soportes Ortodóncicos / Grabado Dental / Láseres de Estado Sólido / Cementos de Ionómero Vítreo Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article