Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Integration of transcriptome and proteome profiles in glioblastoma: looking for the missing link.
Lemée, Jean-Michel; Clavreul, Anne; Aubry, Marc; Com, Emmanuelle; de Tayrac, Marie; Mosser, Jean; Menei, Philippe.
  • Lemée JM; Department of Neurosurgery, CHU Angers, University Hospital of Angers, 4, Rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 09, France. Lemee.jmichel@wanadoo.fr.
  • Clavreul A; CRCINA, INSERM, Université de Nantes, Université d'Angers, Angers, France. Lemee.jmichel@wanadoo.fr.
  • Aubry M; Department of Neurosurgery, CHU Angers, University Hospital of Angers, 4, Rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 09, France.
  • Com E; CRCINA, INSERM, Université de Nantes, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
  • de Tayrac M; UEB, UMS 3480 Biosit, Faculté de Médecine, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
  • Mosser J; Plate-forme Génomique Santé Biosit, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
  • Menei P; Inserm U1085 IRSET, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
BMC Mol Biol ; 19(1): 13, 2018 11 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30463513
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Glioblastoma (GB) is the most common and aggressive tumor of the brain. Genotype-based approaches and independent analyses of the transcriptome or the proteome have led to progress in understanding the underlying biology of GB. Joint transcriptome and proteome profiling may reveal new biological insights, and identify pathogenic mechanisms or therapeutic targets for GB therapy. We present a comparison of transcriptome and proteome data from five GB biopsies (TZ) vs their corresponding peritumoral brain zone (PBZ). Omic analyses were performed using RNA microarray chips and the isotope-coded protein label method (ICPL).

RESULTS:

As described in other cancers, we found a poor correlation between transcriptome and proteome data in GB. We observed only two commonly deregulated mRNAs/proteins (neurofilament light polypeptide and synapsin 1) and 12 altered biological processes; they are related to cell communication, synaptic transmission and nervous system processes. This poor correlation may be a consequence of the techniques used to produce the omic profiles, the intrinsic properties of mRNA and proteins and/or of cancer- or GB-specific phenomena. Of interest, the analysis of the transcription factor binding sites present upstream from the open reading frames of all altered proteins identified by ICPL method shows a common binding site for the topoisomerase I and p53-binding protein TOPORS. Its expression was observed in 7/11 TZ samples and not in PBZ. Some findings suggest that TOPORS may function as a tumor suppressor; its implication in gliomagenesis should be examined in future studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this study, we showed a low correlation between transcriptome and proteome data for GB samples as described in other cancer tissues. We observed that NEFL, SYN1 and 12 biological processes were deregulated in both the transcriptome and proteome data. It will be important to analyze more specifically these processes and these two proteins to allow the identification of new theranostic markers or potential therapeutic targets for GB.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glioblastoma / Proteoma / Transcriptoma Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glioblastoma / Proteoma / Transcriptoma Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article