Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison on treatment strategy for chemical cleaning wastewater: Pollutants removal, process design and techno-economic analysis.
Zhou, Zhen; Ruan, Danian; Jiang, Lu-Man; Yang, Yang; Ge, Honghua; Wang, Libing.
  • Zhou Z; College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2588 Changyang Road, Shanghai 200090, China; Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai, 200092, China.
  • Ruan D; College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2588 Changyang Road, Shanghai 200090, China.
  • Jiang LM; College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2588 Changyang Road, Shanghai 200090, China. Electronic address: jiangluman@shiep.edu.cn.
  • Yang Y; College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2588 Changyang Road, Shanghai 200090, China.
  • Ge H; College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2588 Changyang Road, Shanghai 200090, China.
  • Wang L; Shanghai Ahill Chemical Products Co., Ltd, 1038 Guoshun Road, Shanghai 200090, China.
J Environ Manage ; 235: 161-168, 2019 Apr 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30682668
ABSTRACT
Chemical cleaning wastewater (CCW) usually consists of pickling wastewater (PW) and alkaline cleaning wastewater (ACW), and the strategy of separate treatment or combined treatment affects pollutant removal efficiency and cost. In this study, separate and combined treatment of real PW and ACW generated from an on-site cleaning campaign were investigated. A neutralization - fluoride removal - coagulation - oxidation process was constructed for PW and mixed wastewater (MW) treatment, and operational conditions of each process were optimized. The optimal mixing ratio of PW and ACW in the primary neutralization tank was 37, which obtained a near neutral pH, efficient chromaticity and turbidity removal and good settling performance. The neutralized MW and PW were both adjusted pH to 9.5 to precipitate metal ions as hydroxides. After fluoride precipitated as CaF2, the fluoride removal rates of MW and PW were both 99.9%, respectively, and polyaluminum chloride was dosed to improve the settleability of CaF2. Then sodium hypochlorite oxidization was employed to remove NH3-N and soluble COD. Techno-economic analysis based on pilot-scale tests showed that separate treatment of PW and ACW obtained better effluent quality than combined treatment. The total cost of combined treatment (37.44 $/m3) was greatly higher than that of separate treatment of PW and ACW (18.20 $/m3). This study proposed a cost-effective strategy for CCW treatment, and suggested that neutralization with acidic or alkaline wastewater should be systematically considered for technical and economic feasibility.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Contaminantes Químicos del Agua / Contaminantes Ambientales Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Contaminantes Químicos del Agua / Contaminantes Ambientales Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article