Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Complications, oncological and functional outcomes of salvage treatment options following focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and a comprehensive narrative review.
Marra, Giancarlo; Gontero, Paolo; Walz, Jochen Christoph; Sivaraman, Arjun; Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael; Cathelineau, Xavier; Sanchez-Salas, Rafael.
  • Marra G; Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Gontero P; Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Walz JC; Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
  • Sivaraman A; Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
  • Tourinho-Barbosa R; Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
  • Cathelineau X; Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
  • Sanchez-Salas R; Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France. raersas@gmail.com.
World J Urol ; 37(8): 1517-1534, 2019 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30710157
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Whether focal therapy (FT) jeopardizes subsequent prostate cancer (PCa) salvage treatments, when needed, remains a major concern and is largely unknown.

OBJECTIVES:

To describe and report safety, oncological and functional outcomes of salvage treatments following PCa recurrence and/or persistence after FT. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A systematic review on salvage treatments for PCa recurrence/persistence after FT was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines using an 'a priori protocol'. A comprehensive literature review was also performed to investigate options to treat FT PCa recurrence/persistence that have not yet been reported after FT.

RESULTS:

Four retrospective series were included (n = 67 men); overall quality of the studies was low. Salvage treatments yielded 32.8% (n = 22 of 67) biochemical recurrence rate (BCR) after a 7-62-months mean follow-up. No cancer-related deaths occurred. Patients experienced acceptable complications (n = 12 patients; n = 8 Clavien 3) and rare severe incontinence (4.5% using > 2 pads/day). Erectile function (EF) was rarely assessed (62.8% no information available), being overall poor. Other salvage options have been reported following whole-gland ablation and include (1) re-do ablation yielding worst BCR and EF but similar complications and continence compared to first line ablation; (2) salvage radiotherapy yielding 16.6-38.8% BCR and acceptable toxicity profile with urinary and EF being poorly assessed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Current evidence is weak and limited to a few retrospective series. Oncological control is acceptable although it seems lower compared to a primary treatment setting. Functional outcomes are comparable to primary treatment with the exception of EF; overall, suggesting FT has little impact on subsequent salvage treatments. Future studies are needed to confirm the current findings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Terapia Recuperativa Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Terapia Recuperativa Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article