Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-Term Specialized Physical Therapy in Cervical Dystonia: Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
van den Dool, Joost; Visser, Bart; Koelman, Johannes H; Engelbert, Raoul H; Tijssen, Marina A.
  • van den Dool J; Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam,
  • Visser B; ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Koelman JH; Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Engelbert RH; ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Tijssen MA; Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.a.j.de.koning-tijssen@umcg.nl.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 100(8): 1417-1425, 2019 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30796919
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effectiveness of a specialized physical therapy (SPT) program on disability in cervical dystonia (CD) compared to regular physical therapy (RPT).

DESIGN:

A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

SETTING:

This study was performed by a physical therapist in a primary health care setting. Measurements were performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months in the botulinum toxin (BoNT) outpatient clinic of the neurology department.

PARTICIPANTS:

Patients with primary CD and stable on BoNT treatment for 1 year (N=96). MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The primary outcome was disability assessed with the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS). Secondary outcomes were pain, anxiety, depression, quality of life (QOL), and health related costs over 12 months.

RESULTS:

A total of 72 participants (30 men, 42 women) finished the study 40 received SPT, 32 RPT. No significant between group differences were found after 12 months of treatment (P=.326). Over these 12 months both groups improved significantly (P<.001) on the TWSTRS disability scale compared to baseline (SPT 1.7 points, RPT 1.0 points). Short Form 36 (SF-36) General Health Perceptions (P=.046) and self-perceived improvement (P=.007) showed significantly larger improvements after 12 months in favor of SPT. Total health related costs after 12 months were $1373±556 for SPT compared to $1614±917 for RPT.

CONCLUSION:

SPT revealed no significant differences compared to RPT after 12 months of treatment on the TWSTRS disability scale. Both groups showed similar improvements compared to baseline. Positive results in the SPT group were higher patient perceived effects and general health perception. Treatment costs were lower in the SPT group. With lower costs and similar effects, the SPT program seems to be the preferred program to treat CD.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Distonía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Distonía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article