Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy and safety of 16α-[18F]fluoro-17ß-oestradiol PET-CT for the assessment of oestrogen receptor status in recurrent or metastatic lesions in patients with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.
Chae, Sun Young; Ahn, Sei Hyun; Kim, Sung-Bae; Han, Sangwon; Lee, Suk Hyun; Oh, Seung Jun; Lee, Sang Ju; Kim, Hee Jeong; Ko, Beom Seok; Lee, Jong Won; Son, Byung Ho; Kim, Jisun; Ahn, Jin-Hee; Jung, Kyung Hae; Kim, Jeong Eun; Kim, Seog-Young; Choi, Woo Jung; Shin, Hee Jung; Gong, Gyungyub; Lee, Hyo Sang; Lee, Jung Bok; Moon, Dae Hyuk.
  • Chae SY; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Ahn SH; Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim SB; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Han S; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee SH; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Oh SJ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee SJ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim HJ; Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Ko BS; Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee JW; Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Son BH; Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim J; Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Ahn JH; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Jung KH; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim JE; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim SY; Convergence Medicine Research Center, Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Choi WJ; Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Shin HJ; Convergence Medicine Research Center, Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Gong G; Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee HS; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, South Korea.
  • Lee JB; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Moon DH; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: dhmoon@amc.seoul.kr.
Lancet Oncol ; 20(4): 546-555, 2019 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30846327
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A biopsy of first recurrence or metastatic disease is recommended to re-evaluate oestrogen receptor status in patients with breast cancer and to select appropriate treatment. However, retesting for oestrogen receptor status with rebiopsy is not always feasible, depending on lesion location and the risk associated with biopsy, and in these cases clinicians continue to treat patients according to the oestrogen receptor status of the primary tumour. Consequently suboptimal therapy might be offered to these patients. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and safety of 16α-[18F]fluoro-17ß-oestradiol (18F-FES) PET-CT to assess oestrogen receptor status in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS:

We did a prospective cohort study at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. Eligible patients had breast cancer, with first recurrence or metastatic disease at presentation, were 19 years or older, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. The primary objective was to show the agreement between qualitative 18F-FES PET-CT interpretation and the results of oestrogen receptor expression by immunohistochemical assay, a non-reference standard test. Whole-body 18F-FES PET-CT imaging was done after intravenous injection of 111-222 MBq of 18F-FES, with dosing primarily determined by radiation dosimetry analysis. 18F-FES uptake above background intensity was interpreted as positive. Efficacy was assessed in all patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who received 18F-FES and had PET-CT images available (intention-to-diagnose analysis), and safety was assessed in all patients who received 18F-FES. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01986569.

FINDINGS:

Between Nov 27, 2013, and Nov 10, 2016, 93 patients were enrolled. Of the 85 patients included in the efficacy analysis, 47 (55%) were oestrogen receptor-positive and 38 (45%) were oestrogen receptor-negative. Positive status percent agreement between the 18F-FES PET-CT results and oestrogen receptor status by immunohistochemical assay was 76·6% (95% CI 62·0-87·7) and the negative status percent agreement was 100·0% (90·8-100·0). Patients who were oestrogen receptor-positive and had a positive 18F-FES PET-CT result had a significantly higher progesterone receptor expression than those who were oestrogen receptor-positive and had a negative 18F-FES PET-CT result (23 [68%] of 34 patients vs 0 of 11 patients; p<0·0001). The most common adverse event was procedural pain in nine (10%) of 90 patients injected with 18F-FES. No adverse events were related to the study drug except injection site pain in one (1%) patient. No serious adverse events were recorded.

INTERPRETATION:

The high negative percent agreement between 18F-FES PET-CT and oestrogen receptor status by immunohistochemical assay in this cohort suggests that positive 18F-FES uptake by recurrent or metastatic oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer lesions could be an alternative to oestrogen receptor assays in this setting. Staging assessment should include 18F-FES PET-CT when retesting oestrogen receptor status is not feasible.

FUNDING:

Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Ministry of Health and Welfare, South Korea.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Receptores de Estrógenos / Estradiol / Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged País como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Receptores de Estrógenos / Estradiol / Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged País como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article