Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perampanel Treatment for Refractory Status Epilepticus in a Neurological Intensive Care Unit.
Ho, Chen-Jui; Lin, Chih-Hsiang; Lu, Yan-Ting; Shih, Fu-Yuan; Hsu, Che-Wei; Tsai, Wan-Chen; Tsai, Meng-Han.
  • Ho CJ; Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123, Dapi Road, Niaosung District, Kaohsiung, 83301, Taiwan.
  • Lin CH; Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123, Dapi Road, Niaosung District, Kaohsiung, 83301, Taiwan.
  • Lu YT; Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123, Dapi Road, Niaosung District, Kaohsiung, 83301, Taiwan.
  • Shih FY; Department of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Hsu CW; Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123, Dapi Road, Niaosung District, Kaohsiung, 83301, Taiwan.
  • Tsai WC; Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123, Dapi Road, Niaosung District, Kaohsiung, 83301, Taiwan.
  • Tsai MH; Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123, Dapi Road, Niaosung District, Kaohsiung, 83301, Taiwan. menghan@cgmh.org.tw.
Neurocrit Care ; 31(1): 24-29, 2019 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30891695
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Perampanel is a novel anti-epileptic drug (AED) which acts as a non-competitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor antagonist to reduce glutamate-mediated postsynaptic excitation. Previous animal studies and a few case reports/series have suggested that it may be effective to treat refractory status epilepticus (RSE). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 67 consecutive patients with RSE, of whom 22 received perampanel. The clinical features, epidemiology-based mortality score in status epilepticus, status epilepticus severity score, seizure control, functional outcome, RSE etiology, and electroencephalogram findings were collected. Responder to perampanel was defined as seizure resolution within 4 days of therapy with perampanel being the last AED used plus no recurrence during hospitalization. RESULTS: Eight of the 22 (36.4%) RSE patients fulfilled the definition of responder to perampanel. An additional 1 patient responded to perampanel after 4 days of treatment. In total, perampanel was the last AED in 9 (40.1%) patients. Among the 8 responders to perampanel, 5 had convulsive SE, 1 had non-convulsive SE, and 2 had focal motor SE. The responders accounted for both of the patients with focal motor SE (100%), 5 (33.3%) of the 15 patients with convulsive SE, and 1 (20%) of the 5 patients with non-convulsive SE. The ictal and inter-ictal activities also decreased after perampanel therapy, and three patients (13.6%) had preferable outcomes at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Perampanel may be an effective add-on treatment for RSE even in patients who failed multiple AEDs. Our study suggests that perampanel may be more effective for focal motor SE and convulsive SE than non-convulsive SE. As most previous studies have focused on non-convulsive SE, further studies are warranted to clarify the effectiveness of perampanel for different subtypes of SE.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Piridonas / Estado Epiléptico / Cuidados Críticos / Anticonvulsivantes Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Piridonas / Estado Epiléptico / Cuidados Críticos / Anticonvulsivantes Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article