Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A multicenter randomized controlled trial using a novel collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: Outcome at prosthetic delivery and at 1-year follow-up.
Urban, Istvan A; Wessing, Bastian; Alández, Nuria; Meloni, Silvio; González-Martin, Oscar; Polizzi, Giovanni; Sanz-Sanchez, Igancio; Montero, Eduardo; Zechner, Werner.
  • Urban IA; Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Wessing B; Graduate Implant Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California.
  • Alández N; Urban Regeneration Institute, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Meloni S; Private Clinic, Aachen, Germany.
  • González-Martin O; Private Clinic, Madrid, Spain.
  • Polizzi G; Department of Surgical, Microsurgical, and Medical Sciences, Dentistry Unit, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
  • Sanz-Sanchez I; Gonzalez+Solano Atelier Dental, Madrid, Spain.
  • Montero E; Private Clinic BSC, Verona, Italy.
  • Zechner W; ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal Diseases) Research Group, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 30(6): 487-497, 2019 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30927498
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare clinical performance of a novel resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membrane (CXP) with a reference membrane (non-cross-linked resorbable membrane; BG) for simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration (GBR) at dehisced single implant sites. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Preliminary data from this randomized controlled trial were reported previously; this is the 12-month report. The primary outcome measure was defected height at 6 months post-GBR. Secondary outcomes included implant cumulative survival rate (CSR) and success rate since placement; bone level changes, pink esthetic score (PES), and patient satisfaction since definitive prosthesis delivery; patient quality of life since pretreatment; and the 1-year bleeding index. Non-parametric statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS:

Among patients, 24 were treated with CXP and 25 with BG. The 1-year implant CSR and success rate were 100% (n = 42). Bone level change between definitive prosthetic delivery and 1 year was not significantly different between the CXP and BG groups (BG + 0.42 mm, CXP + 0.01 mm). The PES increased from 7.55 to 8.10 for the CXP group and from 6.48 to 7.48 for the BG group; 1-year bleeding indices were 0 (16 CXP, 18 BG) and 1 (4 CXP, 2 BG). Patient quality of life changed from an OHIP-14 score of 6.5 at pretreatment to 1.9 at 1 year. Overall satisfaction (visual analogue score) with function and esthetics was 9.9 and 9.7, respectively. Inter-group differences were not significant for assessed outcomes. No device-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of CXP and BG for simultaneous implant placement and GBR at dehisced implant sites similarly reduced defect height and improved secondary measures, indicating non-inferiority.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Implantación Dental Endoósea Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Implantación Dental Endoósea Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article