Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-intensity interval training in chronic kidney disease: A randomized pilot study.
Beetham, Kassia S; Howden, Erin J; Fassett, Robert G; Petersen, Aaron; Trewin, Adam J; Isbel, Nicole M; Coombes, Jeff S.
  • Beetham KS; School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Howden EJ; School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Fassett RG; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Petersen A; School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Trewin AJ; Institute of Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Isbel NM; Institute of Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Coombes JS; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Scand J Med Sci Sports ; 29(8): 1197-1204, 2019 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31025412
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) increases mitochondrial biogenesis and cardiorespiratory fitness in chronic disease populations, however has not been studied in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to compare the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of HIIT with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in people with CKD.

METHODS:

Fourteen individuals with stage 3-4 CKD were randomized to 3 supervised sessions/wk for 12 weeks, of HIIT (n = 9, 4 × 4 minute intervals, 80%-95% peak heart rate [PHR]) or MICT (n = 5, 40 minutes, 65% PHR). Feasibility was assessed via session attendance and adherence to the exercise intensity. Safety was examined by adverse event reporting. Efficacy was determined from changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 peak), exercise capacity (METs), and markers of mitochondrial biogenesis (PGC1α protein levels), muscle protein catabolism (MuRF1), and muscle protein synthesis (p-P70S6k Thr389 ).

RESULTS:

Participants completed a similar number of sessions in each group (HIIT = 33.0[7.0] vs MICT = 33.5[3.3] sessions), and participants adhered to the target heart rates. There were no adverse events attributable to exercise training. There was a significant time effect for exercise capacity (HIIT = +0.8 ± 1.2; MICT = +1.3 ± 1.6 METs; P = 0.01) and muscle protein synthesis (HIIT = +0.6 ± 1.1; MICT = +1.4 ± 1.7 au; P = 0.04). However, there were no significant (P > 0.05) group × time effects for any outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

This pilot study demonstrated that HIIT is a feasible and safe option for people with CKD, and there were similar benefits of HIIT and MICT on exercise capacity and skeletal muscle protein synthesis. These data support a larger trial to further evaluate the effectiveness of HIIT.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Insuficiencia Renal Crónica / Terapia por Ejercicio / Entrenamiento de Intervalos de Alta Intensidad / Capacidad Cardiovascular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Insuficiencia Renal Crónica / Terapia por Ejercicio / Entrenamiento de Intervalos de Alta Intensidad / Capacidad Cardiovascular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article