Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Strong scientific theorizing is needed to improve replicability in psychological science.
Carsel, Timothy; Demos, Alexander P; Motyl, Matt.
  • Carsel T; Department of Psychology,University of Illinois at Chicago,Chicago,IL 60607.timothy.carsel@gmail.comademos@uic.edumatt.motyl@gmail.comwww.timcarsel.wordpress.comwww.alexanderdemos.org/www.mattmotyl.com.
  • Demos AP; Department of Psychology,University of Illinois at Chicago,Chicago,IL 60607.timothy.carsel@gmail.comademos@uic.edumatt.motyl@gmail.comwww.timcarsel.wordpress.comwww.alexanderdemos.org/www.mattmotyl.com.
  • Motyl M; Department of Psychology,University of Illinois at Chicago,Chicago,IL 60607.timothy.carsel@gmail.comademos@uic.edumatt.motyl@gmail.comwww.timcarsel.wordpress.comwww.alexanderdemos.org/www.mattmotyl.com.
Behav Brain Sci ; 41: e123, 2018 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31064576
The target article makes the important case for making replicability mainstream. Yet, their proposal targets a symptom, rather than the underlying cause of low replication rates. We argue that psychological scientists need to devise stronger theories that are more clearly falsifiable. Without strong, falsifiable theories in the original research, attempts to replicate the original research are nigh uninterpretable.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Investigación Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Investigación Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article