Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mapping responsible conduct in the uncharted field of research-creation: A scoping review.
Voarino, N; Couture, V; Mathieu-Chartier, S; Bélisle-Pipon, J C; St-Hilaire, E; Williams-Jones, B; Lapointe, F J; Noury, C; Cloutier, M; Gauthier, P.
  • Voarino N; a Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health , Université de Montréal , Montréal , Canada.
  • Couture V; b Faculté des sciences infirmières , Université Laval , Québec , Canada.
  • Mathieu-Chartier S; c Department of Psychopedagogy and Andragogy , Université de Montréal , Montréal , Canada.
  • Bélisle-Pipon JC; d Petrie-Flom Center , Harvard Law School , Cambridge , MA , USA.
  • St-Hilaire E; e Health Law Institute , Dalhousie University , Halifax , Canada.
  • Williams-Jones B; f Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Society and Culture , Concordia University , Montréal , Canada.
  • Lapointe FJ; a Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health , Université de Montréal , Montréal , Canada.
  • Noury C; g Department of Biological Sciences , Université de Montréal , Montréal , Canada.
  • Cloutier M; h School of media , Université du Québec à Montréal , Montréal , Canada.
  • Gauthier P; g Department of Biological Sciences , Université de Montréal , Montréal , Canada.
Account Res ; 26(5): 311-346, 2019 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31134814
ABSTRACT
This scoping review addresses the issues of responsible conduct of research (RCR) that can arise in the practice of research-creation (RC), an emergent, interdisciplinary, and heterogeneous field at the interface of academic research and creative activities. Little is yet known about the nature and scope of RCR issues in RC, so our study examined three questions (1) What are the specific issues in RC in relation to RCR? (2) How does the specificity of RC influence the understanding and practice of RCR? (3) What recommendations could help address the issues highlighted in the literature? To answer these questions, we conducted a scoping review of the academic literature (n = 181 texts) dealing with RCR in RC. We found that researcher-creators faced some very different RCR challenges in comparison with their colleagues in the rest of academia. Addressing these issues is important for both the RCR and RC communities in order to ensure that the rapid development of this field occurs in line with the norms of RCR which, nonetheless, should be adapted to respect the particularities of RC and allow its contributions to the academic world.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Mala Conducta Científica Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Mala Conducta Científica Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article