Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial.
Jambor, Ivan; Verho, Janne; Ettala, Otto; Knaapila, Juha; Taimen, Pekka; Syvänen, Kari T; Kiviniemi, Aida; Kähkönen, Esa; Perez, Ileana Montoya; Seppänen, Marjo; Rannikko, Antti; Oksanen, Outi; Riikonen, Jarno; Vimpeli, Sanna Mari; Kauko, Tommi; Merisaari, Harri; Kallajoki, Markku; Mirtti, Tuomas; Lamminen, Tarja; Saunavaara, Jani; Aronen, Hannu J; Boström, Peter J.
  • Jambor I; Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Verho J; Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.
  • Ettala O; Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Knaapila J; Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Taimen P; Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Syvänen KT; Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Kiviniemi A; Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Kähkönen E; Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Perez IM; Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Seppänen M; Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Rannikko A; Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Oksanen O; Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Riikonen J; Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Vimpeli SM; Department of Future Technologies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Kauko T; Department of Surgery, Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, Finland.
  • Merisaari H; Department of Urology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Kallajoki M; Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Mirtti T; Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
  • Lamminen T; Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Saunavaara J; Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Aronen HJ; Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Boström PJ; Department of Future Technologies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
PLoS Med ; 16(6): e1002813, 2019 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31158230
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with targeted biopsy (TB) is increasingly used in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer (PCa), but the long acquisition times, high costs, and inter-center/reader variability of routine multiparametric prostate MRI limit its wider adoption. METHODS AND

FINDINGS:

The aim was to validate a previously developed unique MRI acquisition and reporting protocol, IMPROD biparametric MRI (bpMRI) (NCT01864135), in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in a multi-institutional trial (NCT02241122). IMPROD bpMRI has average acquisition time of 15 minutes (no endorectal coil, no intravenous contrast use) and consists of T2-weighted imaging and 3 separate diffusion-weighed imaging acquisitions. Between February 1, 2015, and March 31, 2017, 364 men with a clinical suspicion of PCa were enrolled at 4 institutions in Finland. Men with an equivocal to high suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 3-5) of PCa had 2 TBs of up to 2 lesions followed by a systematic biopsy (SB). Men with a low to very low suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 1-2) had only SB. All data and protocols are freely available. The primary outcome of the trial was diagnostic accuracy-including overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value-of IMPROD bpMRI for clinically significant PCa (SPCa), which was defined as a Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 (Gleason grade group 2 or higher). In total, 338 (338/364, 93%) prospectively enrolled men completed the trial. The accuracy and NPV of IMPROD bpMRI for SPCa were 70% (113/161) and 95% (71/75) (95% CI 87%-98%), respectively. Restricting the biopsy to men with equivocal to highly suspicious IMPROD bpMRI findings would have resulted in a 22% (75/338) reduction in the number of men undergoing biopsy while missing 4 (3%, 4/146) men with SPCa. The main limitation is uncertainty about the true PCa prevalence in the study cohort, since some of the men may have PCa despite having negative biopsy findings.

CONCLUSIONS:

IMPROD bpMRI demonstrated a high NPV for SPCa in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in this prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02241122.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article