Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The efficacy and safety of cangrelor in single vessel vs multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from CHAMPION PHOENIX.
Yong, Celina M; Sundaram, Vandana; Abnousi, Freddy; Olivier, Christoph B; Yang, Jaden; Stone, Gregg W; Steg, Philippe G; Michael Gibson, C; Hamm, Christian W; Price, Matthew J; Deliargyris, Efthymios N; Prats, Jayne; White, Harvey D; Harrington, Robert A; Bhatt, Deepak L; Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
  • Yong CM; Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California.
  • Sundaram V; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Abnousi F; Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Olivier CB; Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California.
  • Yang J; Stanford Center for Clinical Research (SCCR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Stone GW; Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Heart Center Freiburg University, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Steg PG; Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Michael Gibson C; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Hamm CW; DHU (Département Hospitalo-Universitaire)-FIRE (Fibrosis, Inflammation, REmodelling), Hôpital Bichat, AP-HPb (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, and FACT (French Alliance for Cardiovascular clinical Trials), an F-CRIN network, INSERM U-1148, Paris,
  • Price MJ; NLHI, ICMS, Royal Brompton Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
  • Deliargyris EN; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Cardiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Prats J; Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
  • White HD; Scripps Clinic and Scripps Translational Science Institute, La Jolla, California.
  • Harrington RA; Science and Strategy Consulting Group, Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
  • Bhatt DL; Elysis, Carlisle, Massachusetts.
  • Mahaffey KW; Auckland City Hospital, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Clin Cardiol ; 42(9): 797-805, 2019 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31254472
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The intravenous, rapidly acting P2Y12 inhibitor cangrelor reduces the rate of ischemic events during PCI with no significant increase in severe bleeding. However, the efficacy and safety of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients treated with single vessel (SV)-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or multivessel (MV)-PCI remains unexplored.

METHODS:

We studied the modified intention-to-treat population of patients from the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial who were randomized to either cangrelor or clopidogrel. We used logistic regression and propensity score matching to evaluate the effect of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel on the primary efficacy outcome (composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis) at 48 hours. The safety outcome was moderate or severe Global Utilization of Streptokinase and tPA for Occluded Arteries bleeding at 48 hours.

HYPOTHESIS:

Cangrelor is as efficacious and safe as clopidogrel in both SV and MV PCI.

RESULTS:

Among 10 854 patients, 9204 (85%) underwent SV- and 1650 (15%) MV-PCI. After adjustment, cangrelor was associated with similar reductions vs clopidogrel in the primary efficacy outcome in patients undergoing SV-PCI (4.5% vs 5.2%; odds ratio [OR] 0.81 [0.66-0.98]) or MV-PCI (6.1% vs 9.8%, OR 0.59 [0.41-0.85]; Pint 0.14). Similar results were observed after propensity score matching (SV-PCI 5.5% vs 5.9%, OR 0.93 [0.74-1.18]; MV-PCI 6.2% vs 8.9%, OR 0.67 [0.44-1.01]; Pint 0.17). There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the treatment effect of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel for the safety outcome.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients undergoing SV- or MV-PCI, cangrelor was associated with similar relative risk reductions in ischemic complications and no increased risk of significant bleeding compared with clopidogrel, which highlights the expanding repertoire of options for use in complex PCI.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article