Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How and why does discretionary food consumption change when we promote fruit and vegetables? Results from the ShopSmart randomised controlled trial.
Opie, Rachelle S; McNaughton, Sarah A; Crawford, David; Abbott, Gavin; Ball, Kylie.
  • Opie RS; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3125, Australia.
  • McNaughton SA; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3125, Australia.
  • Crawford D; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3125, Australia.
  • Abbott G; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3125, Australia.
  • Ball K; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3125, Australia.
Public Health Nutr ; 23(1): 124-133, 2020 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31570114
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The present study aimed to identify whether discretionary food consumption declined in an intervention focused primarily on promoting fruit and vegetable consumption. We also aimed to identify potential mediators explaining intervention effects on discretionary food consumption.

DESIGN:

Secondary analysis of data from the ShopSmart study, a randomised controlled trial involving a 6-month intervention promoting fruit and vegetable consumption. Linear regression models examined intervention effects on discretionary food consumption at intervention completion (T2). A half-longitudinal mediator analyses was performed to examine the potential mediating effect of personal and environmental factors on the association between the intervention effects and discretionary food consumption. Indirect (mediated) effects were tested by the product of coefficients method with bootstrapped se using Andrew Hayes' PROCESS macro for SPSS.

SETTING:

Women were recruited via the Coles FlyBuys loyalty card database in socio-economically disadvantaged suburbs of Melbourne, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS:

Analyses included 225 women (116 intervention and 109 control).

RESULTS:

Compared with controls, intervention participants consumed fewer discretionary foods at T2, after adjusting for key confounders (B = -0·194, 95 % CI -0·378, -0·010 servings/d; P = 0·039). While some mediators were associated with the outcome (taste, outcome expectancies, self-efficacy, time constraints), there was no evidence that they mediated intervention effects.

CONCLUSIONS:

The study demonstrated that a behavioural intervention promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among socio-economically disadvantaged participants was effective in reducing discretionary food intake. Although specific mediators were not identified, researchers should continue searching for mechanisms by which interventions have an effect to guide future programme design.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Verduras / Dieta / Conducta Alimentaria / Frutas / Promoción de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Verduras / Dieta / Conducta Alimentaria / Frutas / Promoción de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article