Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional technique in peripartum hysterectomy.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of new bipolar vessel sealing system like LigaSure™ compared to the standard surgical technique (suture) during emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH). METHODS: A retrospective observational bicentric study was conducted from February 2005 to August 2018 in the maternity wards of the University Hospital of Toulouse and Angers. All EPHs performed up to 24 h after delivery were included. The main outcome was the total blood loss. Secondary outcomes were operating time, number of blood transfusions, per and postoperative complications. A subgroup analysis was performed between hysterectomies performed in emergency and scheduled hysterectomies. RESULTS: Among 111,266 deliveries, 86 women (0.07%) underwent EPH, 29 were operated upon with LigaSure™, 57 with the traditional technique. In the LigaSure™ arm, there were statistically lower blood loss (3198 mL vs 4223 mL, p = 0.02), fewer blood transfusions (62.1% vs 94.7%, p = 0.0003, confirmed in subgroup analysis), and fewer perioperative complications (8.3% vs 45.5%, p = 0.04) for scheduled hysterectomies. CONCLUSION: Bipolar vessel sealing systems such as LigaSure™ are a surgical instrument, easy to use for the surgeon, with an interest in the management of EPH, particularly for total blood loss, transfusions, and intraoperative complications.