Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized phase III trial in patients with recurrent platinum sensitive ovarian cancer comparing efficacy and safety of paclitaxel micellar and Cremophor EL-paclitaxel.
Vergote, I; Bergfeldt, K; Franquet, A; Lisyanskaya, A S; Bjermo, H; Heldring, N; Buyse, M; Brize, A.
  • Vergote I; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: Ignace.Vergote@kuleuven.be.
  • Bergfeldt K; Joint Commission of County Councils for Advanced Radiotherapy, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Franquet A; International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • Lisyanskaya AS; City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, St Petersburg, Russia.
  • Bjermo H; Oasmia Pharmaceutical AB, Vallongatan 1, SE-752 28 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Heldring N; Oasmia Pharmaceutical AB, Vallongatan 1, SE-752 28 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Buyse M; International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • Brize A; Latvian Oncology Center, Riga Eastern Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Gynecol Oncol ; 156(2): 293-300, 2020 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31826802
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Paclitaxel micellar was developed to avoid Cremophor-EL (Cr-EL) associated dose limiting toxicity and to allow a shorter infusion time. The efficacy and safety of paclitaxel micellar (+carboplatin) was compared to Cr-EL paclitaxel (+carboplatin) in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal carcinoma.

METHODS:

This was a multicentre, open-label, randomized phase III trial. Adult patients with recurrent disease was assigned to six 3-week cycles of paclitaxel micellar (250 mg/m2) administered as 1-h infusion or Cr-EL paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) as 3-h infusion. Both arms received carboplatin (AUC 5-6). Primary objective was non-inferiority for progression free survival (PFS) using computed tomography scans. Overall survival (OS) was included as secondary endpoint.

RESULTS:

Between 2009 and 2013, 789 patients were randomized to receive experimental (N = 397) or control (N = 392) treatment. PFS for paclitaxel micellar was non-inferior to Cr-EL paclitaxel with a hazard ratio of 0.86 (95% CI 0.72;1.03) in the per protocol population (PP), favouring paclitaxel micellar (non-inferiority margin was 1.2). Non-inferiority of OS was shown in the PP population with a hazard ratio of 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.16), favouring paclitaxel micellar (non-inferiority margin was 1.185). The most common adverse event was neutropenia (grade ≥ 3); 245 patients (79%) for paclitaxel micellar vs 213 patients (66%) for Cr-EL paclitaxel. The frequency of peripheral sensory neuropathy (any grade) was similar between the arms; 16% for paclitaxel micellar and 20% for Cr-EL paclitaxel.

CONCLUSION:

Paclitaxel micellar (+ carboplatin) is non-inferior to Cr-EL paclitaxel (+ carboplatin) in terms of PFS and OS in the studied population. It provides a treatment option of a higher paclitaxel dose with a shorter infusion time without mandatory premedication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER 2008-002668-32 (EudraCT), NCT00989131 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article