Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and validation testing of a weight management nutrition knowledge questionnaire for adults.
Mikhail, Dalia; Rolls, Barbara; Yost, Kathleen; Balls-Berry, Joyce; Gall, Margaret; Blixt, Kristen; Novotny, Paul; Albertie, Monica; Jensen, Michael.
  • Mikhail D; Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Rolls B; Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
  • Yost K; Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Balls-Berry J; Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Center for Clinical and Translational Science Community Engagement Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Gall M; Clinical Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Blixt K; Clinical Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Novotny P; Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Albertie M; Office of Health Disparities Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Jensen M; Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. jensen.michael@mayo.edu.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 44(3): 579-589, 2020 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31911666
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVES:

Because no validated tool exists to assess nutrition knowledge regarding weight management we developed and tested the Weight Management Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire (WMNKQ). SUBJECTS/

METHODS:

The questionnaire assesses nutrition knowledge in these categories energy density of food, portion size/serving size, alcohol and sugar sweetened beverages, how food variety affects food intake, and reliable nutrition information sources. In total 60 questions were reviewed by 6 experts for face validity and quantitative analysis was used to assess item difficulty, item discrimination, internal consistency, inter-item-correlation, test-retest reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, and convergent validity.

RESULTS:

The final WMNKQ contained 43 items. Experts removed 3 of the original 60 questions and modified 41. Eighteen items did not meet criteria for item difficulty, item discrimination, and/or inter-item correlation; 4 were retained. The WMNKQ met criteria for internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), reliability (test-retest correlation ρ = 0.90, P < 0.0001), construct validity (known groups comparison) - dietitians scored 16% better (p < 0.0001) than information technology workers, and criterion validity (pre- to post-intervention improvement in knowledge scores = 11.2% (95% CI 9.8-12.5, p < 0.0001)). Participants younger than age 55 scored significantly better than those over age 55 (convergent validity).

CONCLUSIONS:

The WMNKQ measures how well nutrition principles of weight management are understood.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Peso Corporal / Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud / Encuestas Nutricionales Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Peso Corporal / Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud / Encuestas Nutricionales Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article