Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Invasive non-native species likely to threaten biodiversity and ecosystems in the Antarctic Peninsula region.
Hughes, Kevin A; Pescott, Oliver L; Peyton, Jodey; Adriaens, Tim; Cottier-Cook, Elizabeth J; Key, Gillian; Rabitsch, Wolfgang; Tricarico, Elena; Barnes, David K A; Baxter, Naomi; Belchier, Mark; Blake, Denise; Convey, Peter; Dawson, Wayne; Frohlich, Danielle; Gardiner, Lauren M; González-Moreno, Pablo; James, Ross; Malumphy, Christopher; Martin, Stephanie; Martinou, Angeliki F; Minchin, Dan; Monaco, Andrea; Moore, Niall; Morley, Simon A; Ross, Katherine; Shanklin, Jonathan; Turvey, Katharine; Vaughan, David; Vaux, Alexander G C; Werenkraut, Victoria; Winfield, Ian J; Roy, Helen E.
  • Hughes KA; British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK.
  • Pescott OL; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Oxfordshire, UK.
  • Peyton J; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Oxfordshire, UK.
  • Adriaens T; Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Brussels, Belgium.
  • Cottier-Cook EJ; Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Dunbeg, UK.
  • Key G; GB Non-native Species Secretariat, Animal and Plant Health Agency, York, UK.
  • Rabitsch W; Environment Agency Austria, Vienna, Austria.
  • Tricarico E; Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Barnes DKA; British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK.
  • Baxter N; Falkland Islands Government, Stanley, Falkland Islands.
  • Belchier M; Government of South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands, Stanley, Falkland Islands.
  • Blake D; Falkland Islands Government, Stanley, Falkland Islands.
  • Convey P; British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK.
  • Dawson W; Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
  • Frohlich D; SWCA Environmental Consultants, Honolulu, HI, USA.
  • Gardiner LM; Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge Herbarium, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
  • González-Moreno P; CABI, Egham, UK.
  • James R; Department of Forest Engineering, ERSAF, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
  • Malumphy C; Government of South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands, Stanley, Falkland Islands.
  • Martin S; National Agri-Food Innovation Campus, Fera Science Ltd., York, UK.
  • Martinou AF; The Administrator's Office, Government of Tristan da Cunha, Edinburgh of the Seven Seas, Tristan da Cunha.
  • Minchin D; The Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Monaco A; Marine Organism Investigations, Killaloe, Ireland.
  • Moore N; Directorate Environment and Natural Systems of the Lazio Regional Authority, Rome, Italy.
  • Morley SA; GB Non-native Species Secretariat, Animal and Plant Health Agency, York, UK.
  • Ross K; British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK.
  • Shanklin J; Falklands Conservation, Stanley, Falkland Islands.
  • Turvey K; British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK.
  • Vaughan D; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Oxfordshire, UK.
  • Vaux AGC; British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK.
  • Werenkraut V; Medical Entomology Group, Emergency Response Science & Technology, Public Health England, Salisbury, UK.
  • Winfield IJ; Laboratorio Ecotono, Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue/INIBIOMA-CONICET, Bariloche, Argentina.
  • Roy HE; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Oxfordshire, UK.
Glob Chang Biol ; 26(4): 2702-2716, 2020 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31930639
ABSTRACT
The Antarctic is considered to be a pristine environment relative to other regions of the Earth, but it is increasingly vulnerable to invasions by marine, freshwater and terrestrial non-native species. The Antarctic Peninsula region (APR), which encompasses the Antarctic Peninsula, South Shetland Islands and South Orkney Islands, is by far the most invaded part of the Antarctica continent. The risk of introduction of invasive non-native species to the APR is likely to increase with predicted increases in the intensity, diversity and distribution of human activities. Parties that are signatories to the Antarctic Treaty have called for regional assessments of non-native species risk. In response, taxonomic and Antarctic experts undertook a horizon scanning exercise using expert opinion and consensus approaches to identify the species that are likely to present the highest risk to biodiversity and ecosystems within the APR over the next 10 years. One hundred and three species, currently absent in the APR, were identified as relevant for review, with 13 species identified as presenting a high risk of invading the APR. Marine invertebrates dominated the list of highest risk species, with flowering plants and terrestrial invertebrates also represented; however, vertebrate species were thought unlikely to establish in the APR within the 10 year timeframe. We recommend (a) the further development and application of biosecurity measures by all stakeholders active in the APR, including surveillance for species such as those identified during this horizon scanning exercise, and (b) use of this methodology across the other regions of Antarctica. Without the application of appropriate biosecurity measures, rates of introductions and invasions within the APR are likely to increase, resulting in negative consequences for the biodiversity of the whole continent, as introduced species establish and spread further due to climate change and increasing human activity.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article