Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of five versus ten years of alendronate treatment prior to drug holiday for women with osteoporosis.
Nayak, S; Greenspan, S L.
  • Nayak S; Berkeley Madonna, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA. smita.nayak@berkeleymadonna.com.
  • Greenspan SL; School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Osteoporos Int ; 31(7): 1273-1282, 2020 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32020265
ABSTRACT
We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing 5 versus 10 years of alendronate treatment prior to 5-year drug holiday for US postmenopausal women with hip BMD T-scores between - 2.5 and - 3.5. We found that for most postmenopausal women 5 years of treatment prior to drug holiday is the more effective and cost-effective option.

INTRODUCTION:

We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare 5 versus 10 years of alendronate treatment prior to 5-year drug holiday for postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

METHODS:

We created an individual-level state-transition microsimulation model to compare 3 treatment strategies for US postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and femoral neck BMD T-scores between - 2.5 and - 3.5 at baseline recurrent periods of 5 years of alendronate followed by 5 years of drug holiday (alendronate 5/5), recurrent periods of 10 years of alendronate followed by 5 years of drug holiday (alendronate 10/5), and no alendronate treatment.

RESULTS:

Base-case analysis revealed for women initiating treatment at ages 50, 60, and 70, the alendronate 5/5 strategy dominated (was more effective and less costly than) the alendronate 10/5 strategy and no treatment. For women age 80, the alendronate 10/5 strategy dominated. When assuming a lower relative risk of nonvertebral fracture during years 6-10 of alendronate treatment than the base-case assumption, the alendronate 10/5 strategy became the most cost-effective strategy even at younger treatment initiation ages. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results supported the base-case findings; for treatment initiation ages of 50, 60, and 70, the alendronate 5/5 strategy was favored, whereas for treatment initiation age of 80, the alendronate 10/5 strategy was favored; however, there was uncertainty in these findings.

CONCLUSIONS:

After 5 years of alendronate treatment, younger postmenopausal women (ages 50-70) with osteoporosis would likely benefit from a drug holiday, whereas older women (age 80) are likely to benefit from treatment for 10 years before a drug holiday.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoporosis / Preparaciones Farmacéuticas / Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica / Alendronato / Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoporosis / Preparaciones Farmacéuticas / Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica / Alendronato / Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article