Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A short-term inhalation study to assess the reversibility of sensory irritation in human volunteers.
Kleinbeck, Stefan; Schäper, Michael; Pacharra, Marlene; Lehmann, Marie Louise; Golka, Klaus; Blaszkewicz, Meinolf; Brüning, Thomas; van Thriel, Christoph.
  • Kleinbeck S; Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors, TU Dortmund University, Ardeystr. 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany. kleinbeck@ifado.de.
  • Schäper M; Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors, TU Dortmund University, Ardeystr. 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
  • Pacharra M; Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors, TU Dortmund University, Ardeystr. 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
  • Lehmann ML; MSH Medical School Hamburg, University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Am Kaiserkai 1, 20457, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Golka K; Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors, TU Dortmund University, Ardeystr. 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
  • Blaszkewicz M; Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
  • Brüning T; Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors, TU Dortmund University, Ardeystr. 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
  • van Thriel C; Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors, TU Dortmund University, Ardeystr. 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
Arch Toxicol ; 94(5): 1687-1701, 2020 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32185413
ABSTRACT
Sensory irritation is an acute adverse effect caused by chemicals that stimulate chemoreceptors of the upper respiratory tract or the mucous membranes of the outer eye. The avoidance of this end point is of uttermost importance in regulatory toxicology. In this study, repeated exposures to ethyl acrylate were analyzed to investigate possible carryover effects from day to day for different markers of sensory irritation. Thirty healthy subjects were exposed for 4 h on five subsequent days to ethyl acrylate at concentrations permitted by the German occupational exposure limit at the time of study. Ratings of eye irritation as well as eye blinking frequencies indicate the elicitation of sensory irritation. These markers of sensory irritation showed a distinct time course on every single day. However, cumulative carryover effects could not be identified across the week for any marker. The rhinological and biochemical markers could not reveal hints for more pronounced sensory irritation. Neither increased markers of neurogenic inflammation nor markers of immune response could be identified. Furthermore, the performance on neurobehavioral tests was not affected by ethyl acrylate and despite the strong odor of ethyl acrylate the participants improved their performances from day to day. While the affected physiological marker, the increased eye blinking frequency stays roughly on the same level across the week, subjective markers like perception of eye irritation decrease slightly from day to day though the temporal pattern of, i.e., eye irritation perception stays the same on each day. A hypothetical model of eye irritation time course derived from PK/PD modeling of the rabbit eye could explain the within-day time course of eye irritation ratings repeatedly found in this study more precisely.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acrilatos / Exposición por Inhalación / Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire / Irritantes Límite: Adult / Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acrilatos / Exposición por Inhalación / Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire / Irritantes Límite: Adult / Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article