Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Choice of first line systemic treatment in pancreatic cancer among national experts.
Glatzer, M; Horber, D; Montemurro, M; Winterhalder, R; Inauen, R; Berger, M D; Pestalozzi, B; Pederiva, S; Pless, M; Putora, P M.
  • Glatzer M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland. Electronic address: markus.glatzer@kssg.ch.
  • Horber D; Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland.
  • Montemurro M; Department of Medical Oncology, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Winterhalder R; Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland.
  • Inauen R; Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Münsterlingen, Switzerland.
  • Berger MD; Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
  • Pestalozzi B; Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Pederiva S; Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
  • Pless M; Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
  • Putora PM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Pancreatology ; 20(4): 686-690, 2020 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32299764
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Treatment options for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer depend on various factors, including performance status, tumor burden and patient preferences. Metastatic pancreatic cancer is incurable and many systemic treatment options have been investigated over the past decades. This analysis of patterns of practice was performed to identify decision criteria and their impact on the choice of first-line management of metastatic pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Members of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Gastrointestinal Cancer Group were contacted and agreed to participate in this analysis. Decision trees for the first line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer from 9 centers in Switzerland were collected and analyzed based on the objective consensus methodology to identify consensus and discrepancies in clinical decision-making.

RESULTS:

The final treatment algorithms included 3 decision criteria (comorbidities, performance status and age) and 5 treatment options FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOX, gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine mono and best supportive care.

CONCLUSION:

We identified multiple decision criteria relevant to all participating centers. We found consensus for the treatment of young (age below 65) patients with good performance status with FOLFIRINOX. For patients with increasing age and reducing performance status there was a decreasing trend to use gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel. Gemcitabine monotherapy was typically offered to patients in the presence of comorbidities. For patients with ECOG 3-4, most of the experts recommended BSC.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Toma de Decisiones Clínicas / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Toma de Decisiones Clínicas / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article