Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biologics in the treatment of calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease: a systematic literature review.
Cipolletta, Edoardo; Di Matteo, Andrea; Scanu, Anna; Isidori, Martina; Di Battista, Jacopo; Punzi, Leonardo; Grassi, Walter; Filippucci, Emilio.
  • Cipolletta E; Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy. edoardocipolletta@gmail.com.
  • Di Matteo A; Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Universityof Leeds, UK.
  • Scanu A; Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padua, Italy.
  • Isidori M; Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
  • Di Battista J; Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
  • Punzi L; Rheumatology Unit, Centre for Gout and Metabolic Bone and Joint Diseases, SS Giovanni e Paolo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
  • Grassi W; Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
  • Filippucci E; Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 38(5): 1001-1007, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359034
ABSTRACT
The main aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to summarise the evidence in the use of biological therapies in calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD). We performed a SLR using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Only studies reporting the efficacy of biologics in CPPD were selected. The search resulted in 83 articles; 11 were further evaluated in the SLR. Seventy-six patients were included 2 received infliximab, whereas 74 anakinra. Anakinra was used in refractory disease (85.1%) or in patients with contraindications to standard treatments (23.0%). Clinical response to anakinra was observed in 80.6% of patients with acute and 42.9% of those with chronic CPPD. Short-term treatment was well tolerated and adverse events were reported in 4.1% of the cases. This review provides evidence in favour of the use of anakinra as a therapeutic option in patients with CPPD, especially in acute refractory CPPD or when standard treatments are contraindicated.
Asunto(s)
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Productos Biológicos / Condrocalcinosis Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Productos Biológicos / Condrocalcinosis Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article