Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of frontline regimens for older transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Giri, Smith; Aryal, Madan Raj; Yu, Han; Grimshaw, Alyssa; Pathak, Ranjan; Huntington, Scott P; Dhakal, Binod.
  • Giri S; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America. Electronic address: smithgiri@uabmc.edu.
  • Aryal MR; Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
  • Yu H; Department of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
  • Grimshaw A; Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
  • Pathak R; Division of Hematology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
  • Huntington SP; Division of Hematology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
  • Dhakal B; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 11(8): 1285-1292, 2020 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32513568
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Several treatment options are available for the management of older adults with newly diagnosed patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) who are ineligible for hematopoietic cell transplantation (tiMM). We aimed to identify treatment options that provide the best balance in terms of efficacy and safety.

METHODS:

We searched bibliographic databases and meeting libraries for search terms reflecting newly diagnosed and older and/or transplant-ineligible patients from inception to October 21, 2018. Phase II/III randomized trials comparing at least two first line treatment regimens for newly diagnosed tiMM were included. We extracted data on efficacy (progression free survival, PFS, overall survival and overall response rate) and safety (grade ¾ toxicities) and conducted network meta-analysis using Bayesian methods and random effects models. Relative ranking of treatment regimens was assessed using Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities.

RESULTS:

We identified 27 trials involving 12,194 patients. For PFS, the four most effective regimens were Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone (SUCRA 0.960) followed by Daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Dara_RD, SUCRA 0.847), Bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide (SUCRA 0.834) and Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (SUCRA 0.739). Among these four most efficacious regimens, toxicity profile was most favorable for Dara_RD (median additional AEs per patient vs dexamethasone = 0.74; 95% CrI 0.51-1.17; SUCRA 0.430).

CONCLUSION:

Among first line tiMM regimens, increasing efficacy is associated with increased toxicity. We provide relative ranking of these regimens for both efficacy and safety. Future studies should incorporate geriatric assessments and frailty biomarkers to refine treatment decision-making for each individual patient.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mieloma Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mieloma Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article