Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Intraoperative Hand-Off Frequency, Duration, and Context: A Mixed Methods Analysis.
Frasier, Lane L; Pavuluri Quamme, Sudha R; Wiegmann, Douglas; Greenberg, Caprice C.
  • Frasier LL; University of Wisconsin-Madison Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research (WiSOR) Program, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Pavuluri Quamme SR; University of Wisconsin-Madison Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research (WiSOR) Program, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Wiegmann D; University of Wisconsin-Madison Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research (WiSOR) Program, Madison, Wisconsin; University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Greenberg CC; University of Wisconsin-Madison Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research (WiSOR) Program, Madison, Wisconsin; University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: greenberg@surgery.wisc.edu.
J Surg Res ; 256: 124-130, 2020 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32688079
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Hand-offs in the operating room contribute to poor communication, reduced team function, and may be poorly coordinated with other activities. Conversely, they may represent a missed opportunity for improved communication. We sought to better understand the coordination and impact of intraoperative hand-offs.

METHODS:

We prospectively audio-video (AV) recorded 10 operations and evaluated intraoperative hand-offs. Data collected included percentage of time team members were absent due to breaks, relationships between hand-offs and intraoperative events (incision, surgical counts), and occurrences of simultaneous hand-offs. We also identified announcement that a hand-off had occurred and anchoring, in which team members not involved in the hand-off participated and provided information.

RESULTS:

Spanning 2919 min of audio-video data, there were 74 hand-offs (range, 4-14 per case) totaling 225.2 min, representing 7.7% of time recorded. Thirty-two (45.1%) hand-offs were interrupted or delayed because of competing activities; eight hand-offs occurred during an instrument or laparotomy pad count. Six cases had simultaneous hand-offs; two cases had two episodes of simultaneous hand-offs. Eight hand-offs included an announcement. Seven included anchoring. Evaluating both temporary and permanent hand-offs, one or more original team members was absent for 40.7% of time recorded and >one team member was absent for 20.5% of time recorded.

CONCLUSIONS:

Intraoperative hand-offs are frequent and not well coordinated with intraoperative events including counts and other hand-offs. Anchoring and announced hand-offs occurred in a small proportion of cases. Future work must focus on optimizing timing, content, and participation in intraoperative hand-offs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quirófanos / Grupo de Atención al Paciente / Pase de Guardia / Cuidados Intraoperatorios Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quirófanos / Grupo de Atención al Paciente / Pase de Guardia / Cuidados Intraoperatorios Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article